Hmm, My immediate thought actually is that there's a fucking huge overlap. Print your own cornicing for your house... Print your own bath plugs... Print your own custom pipes for the awkward places that are unique to your house... Print your own parts to customise fixtures and fittings. The list is basically endless in the DIY landscape. The only worry home depot might have is that there might be too much overlap, and their sales of other things might drop!

What about this link says the design is better?

But notably, the 3% that actually pay worth a damn ;)

On the contrary, it means almost exactly the same thing. It means the centre of the OS, which manages the hardware. The fact that it was relatively naïve doesn't change the fact that it was a kernel.

Right, they announced a product that no one had done any work on at all... That sounds likely.

They make them out of carbon fibre, layed up in interesting ways usually involving a honeycomb sandwich between two layers of flat carbon fibre.

Another example https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

In this crash, Kubica hit the wall at 300km/h. While the car was completely destroyed, the monocoque was again, completely in tact.

Incorrect, in modern F1, it's virtually unheard of for the monocoque (the footwell, plus the rest of the area the driver sits in) to be compromise in any way. This includes head on into the barriers at 200mph type crashes. At the British grand prix last week, Kimi Raikkonen walked (with a sore ankle) out of a 47g impact. The monocoque was perfectly in tact.

Bullshit. In 1960 you would be correct. In 1980 kernels were written in C, for new fangled micro computers.

If you don't want to get left behind the fads, don't choose an area that's all about fads.

Any kernel developer will currently be using basically the same toolset as they used in 1980.
Any driver developer will currently be using basically the same toolset as they used in 1980.
Any game developer will currently be using basically the same toolset as they used in 2000.

Not everyone jumps on a new shiny framework every 2 years because they're struggling to overcome the limitations of a crappily designed language like javascript. If you don't want to jump from fad to fad... just don't be a web dev.

Right, but I've even seen what you're suggesting happen. This is when this "kindness" is at its most frustrating.

You sit and wait for a gap to get out of a junction. You see a gap, and you get yourself ready to slot into it. Then the jerk in front of the gap decides to be "kind" and slows down to try and let you out. He inevitably miscalculates, and ends up not letting you out, and also closing the gap behind him.

My only assumption is that they don't actually look around them while they're driving. I see this all the time - drivers letting one person out, and holding up an entire queue behind them instead. They simply must not realise there are people behind them.

No, pretty sure you're doing it wrong actually - crispy fish skin is a wonderful thing.

I'm pretty sure you'll have a hard time trying to find a user who legitimately wants to pass arguments to command line tools by naming a bunch of files according to those arguments ;)

Bullshit. Roundabouts are used as the primary method of forming intersections between multilane major roads, and motorways in any country other than the US. They are perfectly capable of dealing with huge amounts of traffic.