This whole article is based on a fallacy - that Computer Science is teaching people to code.

This isn't what a Computer Science degree teaches you.

If you want to add a dozen orders of magnitude, you're talking about 2e12 minutes, i.e. 3800 millennia. Yet, people are happily living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear weapons are in general designed to consume all the highly radioactive things in them - after all, each of those radioactive elements is something that can be turned into energy for an explosion to occur. They don't generally have significant contamination issues.

Japan are probably worried that they are not in any way protected by the US nuclear program. They worry that the US would stop short of getting involved in world war 3 if China really did want to invade Japan. By building their own nuclear arsenal, they remove that possibility and maintain MAD with China.

Not quite - I'm also not defending them, but the consumer has the right to receive what was advertised, not what they thought they were getting.

If kingston advertise certain specs, and the new build still meets those specs, there's no false advertising going on.

What 3rd parties say about their device is neither here nor there, and any consumer believing what said 3rd parties wrote is completely liable for their own mistake in believing something other than what was explicitly advertised.

Let me guess, every single SSD you bought was a low capacity sand force controlled one.

The reason is explained in the video - when you're traveling at that speed, the loads you put through the suspension are huge. You don't want to have the suspension compressed before hand or it'll just break.

The world record requires them to do one run, turn the car (by itself), and repeat the run within 1 hour, so it definitely can turn.

No, this is simply the definition of a theory. If it's simply "I think that mice cause global warming", that's a hypothesis, but as soon as you add "you could test this by doing this, this and this, it predicts this result from the above tests" it becomes a theory. Once you do the testing it may stay a theory, or become simply wrong.

No, you're misunderstanding what a theory is. A theory is merely a hypothesis that has a well understood method of disproving the hypothesis.

No, sex is not the same thing as sexuality.

Similarly, Koninsegg 3D printing the entire gearbox (gears included, already printed inside), and turbo housing (again, turbo fans and compressors already included inside the housing) for the new One:1 car. Also showing that 3D printed materials can indeed stand up to repeated high temperatures and pressures.

On the contrary, I find the idea of an autonomous vehicle with someone who thinks they're clever enough to override it just plain stupid.

Which 4k doesn't improve in any way.

4k is about resolution, only.

Speaking as someone with a 27" 2560x1440 monitor, and a 15" 2880x1800 monitor... No, 2560x1440 is not high enough resolution on 27", and 1920x1200 certainly isn't.

No, it's nothing to do with his eyes sucking, it's to do with the angular resolution that 20/20 vision can pick up. at 8-10 feet, a person with 20/20 vision can not make out better than 1080p on a 60" screen.

How sure are you you don't speak from placebo?