Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Silly (Score 1) 605

What's funny about redacting the aircraft operator flight crew exemption is that the public actually sees this happen. I was at a security checkpoint waiting to put by bag into the X-ray machine when a pilot jumped in front of me. He didn't take his shoes off and walked though the metal detector with his Starbuck's coffee with no questions asked. I was irate! First, these folks get to jump the line, then they're not subject to the security policies. What's to prevent a member of the aircrew from turning into a terrorist?

I guess I'm in line for security theater... and I'm not entertained.

Comment Bad Summary (Score -1) 385

For those who aren't going to RTFA... The article is about Facebook/MySpace games and the deceptive practices used to entice users to buy into offers for in game currency. Not that the actual Video Professor teaching tool is a scam.
Image

Jetman Attempts Intercontinental Flight 140

Last year we ran the story of Yves Rossy and his DIY jetwings. Yves spent $190,000 and countless hours building a set of jet-powered wings which he used to cross the English Channel. Rossy's next goal is to cross the Strait of Gibraltar, from Tangier in Morocco and Tarifa on the southwestern tip of Spain. From the article: "Using a four-cylinder jet pack and carbon fibre wings spanning over 8ft, he will jump out of a plane at 6,500 ft and cruise at 130 mph until he reaches the Spanish coast, when he will parachute to earth." Update 18:57 GMT: mytrip writes: "Yves Rossy took off from Tangiers but five minutes into an expected 15-minute flight he was obliged to ditch into the wind-swept waters."

Comment Re:What's in it? (Score 1) 1698

Honestly, I see the "privately operated co-op" as the same thing as the "government option." If you're forced to pay into the private co-op insurance, and you're forced to pay a higher premium based on your income... there's not much different from paying taxes and having a "government option"... it's essentially the same thing.

Comment Re:Liar beats other liars? (Score 4, Informative) 184

Not only do you have to enroll, but every month they charge you a fee of approximately $10/month. Which might seem okay if you could actually see your credit report every month.... I couldn't figure out how. I had to call them and cancel. The kind of cancellation where you have to convince them that you don't want to be a customer. As far as I am concerned freecreditreport.com is scum of the internet.

Comment Re:What's in it? (Score 1) 1698

"under section 304 establish standards for, accept bids from, and negotiate and enter into contracts with, QHBP offering entities for the offering of health benefits plans through the Health Insurance Exchange" - HR3962, Page 155
Government entering into contract with private companies. Who did you say was operating it?

So the government is making people buy insurance against their will. With the intent of discriminating against personal income and requiring people who make more money to pay more money into the exchange (for the same services.)

Yeah, I'm the once who's the fucking moron...

Comment Re:What's in it? (Score 0, Troll) 1698

What's in it? The destruction of freedom and liberty in America.

- There is language in the bill that once a certain time period is reached (2013 I believe), no one can purchase health insurance from a private insurance company. You have to buy into the government exchange.

- A government health plan (health exchange). Subsidies will be given to people who are deemed to not be able to "afford coverage." - Abortion was removed from federal funding in an attempt to appease centrists repubs and dems. As a libertarian I don't believe the government should be allowed to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body. As a conservative, I see paying for an abortion as FAR less expensive than paying for 18 years of state and federal assistance.

- The much politicized end of life planning (death panels) are in the bill. Republicans, believe it to be consultation with elderly Americans to convince them not to pursue advanced (costly) medical treatment to extend their life; because they have already lived a long life. Democrats are less likely to get into the specific details. The bill itself provides text to describe what it is not (mercy killing) rather than what it is.

- The bill cuts $400 billion from Medicare over 10 years. Once you combine end of life planning (see above), the reason for "end of life planning" appears to be more aligned with the Republicans concept.

- If you don't have health insurance you must buy insurance from the government exchange or face a penalty.

What's not in the bill? Anything to actually control health care costs. Which I see as this:
- Tort reform. (limits and regulation on medical malpractice lawsuits)
- Buying health insurance across state lines.
- Increased payment by Medicare and Medicaid (currently, these plans are subsidized by everyone else with health insurance)
- Prescription drug reform. (I do not believe a drug should be sold in America for more than the cost in the rest of the world. Either Americans are subsidizing the drugs for the rest of the world, or we're being ripped off.)

Comment 4th (Score 1) 451

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Papers and effects? The founding fathers were smart enough to protect email. This ruling is a disgrace.

Comment On my iPod (Score 4, Interesting) 423

I wish someone in Congress actually served their constituents and asked the simple question:
When a consumer buys a CD/DVD is that customer allowed to put it on their mobile media player? If so, and how would they legally go about doing that?

It seems that the **AA wants a one way street when it comes to this issue. They put anti-ripping software on both CDs and DVDs,,, which doesn't actually reduce copyright infringement; it only causes their customers to break laws in order to actually use the content they purchased.

Comment Good Idea (Score 1) 116

About 7 years ago a friend and I were driving down the road on our way to a late night bite at Denny's. It was 2AM and we drove by a person that I instantly recognized... it was my 2nd Uncle who had Alzheimers. We got out of the car and followed him on foot while calling his wife. It turns out he had walked 2 miles from his house and his she didn't even know he was gone. When she got there she asked him where he was going. He said, "back to our house." He was referring to his old house which was about 20 miles away.

Unfortunately, he has since passed away but a device like this could have really come in handy if they knew he was missing.

Comment Thank You (Score 2, Interesting) 131

Maybe now consumers will actually get to use their devices. I have a Blackberry from Verizon and the ex parte filing addresses 1 of my concerns: tethering. If I pay for an unlimited data plan... why can't I tether?
My second issue isn't mentioned but seems anti-consumer. Why can't I use the GPS on my Blackberry Pearl in Google Maps? I even pay for the stupid VZ Navigator software and Google Maps still can't use the GPS.

Comment Re:US First? (Score 1) 73

Dean Kamen's original vision was to promote technology careers in the United States. As FIRST has grown they have added teams from Canada, England, Brazil and Israel. Since then FIRST has toned down the nationalist agenda. For instance, they renamed the final competition from "Nationals" to "Championship." The domain name usfirst.org is a relic from the past.

Slashdot Top Deals

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...