Comment Yes, but I had to leave America to do it. (Score 1) 524
Now making about 50 percent more in Australia. Went from high five figures to low six. Living the American Dream(TM) in the southern hemisphere.
Now making about 50 percent more in Australia. Went from high five figures to low six. Living the American Dream(TM) in the southern hemisphere.
For extra points you could probably modify the registration process in all kinds of manners which would confound an automated and replay attacks. Chances are that for the average forum it would be sufficient that no script would even bother to defeat it and would simply move onto softer targets.
This is the answer, more or less. For small-to-middling forums, reducing spam is pretty easy. A few volunteers to delete the ones that get through suffices for the rest.
It breaks down to 1) keep out easy drive-by spammers, which means registration with a valid email address and some kind of barrier to detour the smarter bots (ReCaptcha and the like); 2) filter posts through Akismet or similar method; 3) have a community large enough and engaged enough to want to zero out spam posts.
The third step is the hardest, and has nothing to do with spam posts.
You're out of your fucking mind if you think a Romney presidency wouldn't be worse than what we've got right now.
It would be an utter and complete horrorshow.
Has this ever, in the history of the United States, actually worked?
I'll spare you the research: no, it hasn't.
My theory is that the US Government was using the RIAA/MPAA as a proxy to get this rammed through.
Wow... are you being deliberately retarded or can you not help it?
Huh?
I missed the part where Kim Dotcom was uploading his own personal BluRay rips to MU.
I *remember* the part where his users did.
I don't give a shit how he made his money or whether or not you consider it "ill-gotten" simply because MU hosted some copyrighted material uploaded by users. It's an absurd contortion of logic and reason to say that he deserves none of his money because some of his users misbehaved.
$100m is the equivalent of one mid-tier movie budget. If you think Hollywood actually felt that tiny financial "hit", you're the one who's hopelessly naive.
So there would be two big hurdles for a plaintiff here: (1) a duty to keep one's internet connection secure and (2) the idea that there has actually been harm.
#1 fails because there's no requirement, either written or implied, that a user's internet connection be secured.
#2 fails because common sense.
The US should cut its losses, give the dude his servers and money back, and go after some actual criminals. This is just pathetic.
No, they absolutely didn't. You're either ignorant or lying.
So, now you're re-framing the fucking debate. Originally your claim was that "all" liberals want "all" illegal immigrants to stay.
Stop fucking moving the goalposts, you dumb cunt.
Apparently people in Louisiana do not.
How the fuck can you even ask this question on a tech website?
Get back to Answers In Genesis, please.
On one side the Liberals declare that people entering the USA, even illegally, should be considered as "legal", so long as they do not make trouble
I've literally never, in my entire life, heard any self-described "liberal" say this. Never. You're setting up a false dichotomy so you can make it look the problem is being caused by both sides.
It isn't.
This is entirely a right-wing issue, and the flames of racism are being fanned entirely by so-called "conservatives".
UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker