Comment Re:filling it with enough *air* (Score 1) 116
No, calling Nitrogen Air is as justified as calling Helium Air.
Colloquially air is something you can breathe without dying.
Technically air is well defined as a mixture of gases.
No, calling Nitrogen Air is as justified as calling Helium Air.
Colloquially air is something you can breathe without dying.
Technically air is well defined as a mixture of gases.
Sorry somehow i could not get a list of products without signing up.
And there are no written examples on the html5-web2.0ish HP.
You can fill it with as much air as you want, and it wont fly.
And that is not what the google statement says
* including 3D printing,
Nope. wont change my life or work. For the things I am involved in it is either too expensive, or already relevant.
* embedded systems
Nope. changed my life already. I saw how the analog chips which we used in the end of the 90s for signal processing became obsolete and unavailable/expensive (-> Burr Brown being bough by TI) Not a new tech at all.
* and evolving Web APIs
Oh yeah, because that going to mache such a big difference
Being a web programmer is the same as brein able to enter University?
I mean dont get me wrong, i appreciate people who early in their life know what to to and do that well, even if there is is no academic education involved.
But somehow i dount that such people will be the main participants in such "bootcamps".
Why should a radio link have higher latency than a fiber?
Fascist? Nope.
Your Employer provides with tools and guidelines. if something is not explicitly allowed, then it is your responsibility to check if it is according to the rules of the company. Giving up the control over data usually is not acceptable.
If you use tools which essentially give up the control over the data to any third party (as you do in evernote), possibly even with terms and conditions which have zero accountability of the service provider, just because you like a service because it is "practical and free".
These "practical and free" services would be where i as attacker would start targeted attacks.
"Big Data is data that cannot be dealt with using regular RDBMSes"
Let's say: you may need or use a "regular" (RDBMs) for some things in big data, but it's not going to be your "Data Warehouse".
Let's clearly separate the cases
a) You are an institution which is powerful/rich enough to build (AFAIU they were talking about the raw metals here) operate a isotope enrichment plant, breeder reactors, and compose these to a *working* nuclear device (Ahem even countries like North Korea or Iran take a while for this): It's very likely that you were able to contact sellers of these required equipment without the internet (and doing so via the internet may get you on a list of the NSA to watch)
b) You are a terrorist organisation with a moderate amount (~0.5-1B Dollar), but no backing infrastructure: Good luck in powering up the centrifuges without anybody noticing; you have to buy the plutonium directly.
I for my part consider buying a cheap windows tablet, which includes a office 2013 version.
I was referrring to the routing of the power traces/ground planes on the PCB and saving additional EMI filters on the circuit boards. Isolating at the wall would also not help.
Should fix this problem - unless the super-cheaply designed mainborard and graphica card emit the signal via the ground plane/power line
If you are an decently qualidied Adminsitrator, then you always conciously choose between the following:
a) You customize/install/update/recompile/patch the software you need on your own time. Usually you do thos when the service availability is absolutely critical and at the same time no out of the box solution exists
b) You use an "out of the box" solution. This solution should be supported, and used within its nominal use case.
Ubuntu very clearly states that Universe packages may - at best - only receive a minimal quality check at the distibution release and are patched by maintainers, which are not necessarily authors of the software nor employees of ubunut. As such their time which they may spend to predictably react to problems is limited, and, if anything in their life changes they just have to stop doing anything for the package without further warning - if the packge is important enogh for you, donate money to the maintainer and pay him.
I appreciate that the author loudly raises his concers, but i think anybody running an unsupported port of an program is responsible for himself. Pulling the pckage is not good. I for my part run any service for myself (file sharing etc) on a machine which only shows a single port for a vpn to the outside world. If something other than a security problem in the VPN software apprears, i would prefer to contunue using (and reinstalling) the packages which I chose.
If I run SW which faces the internet, then if fix it myself
is far beyond what i need at home, it is more that i need to have a perfect remote terminal. If i need more, i rent a server with a good network connection.
and IMHO that is it's unique selling point. You can run programs written 20 years ago unchanged without the programs looking like garbage.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne