Is that what the guy on record for stating "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" said to you?

Standard Lefty Whines numbers 7 & 8.
Where's our Communist Manifesto installment, Mr. Fulldiaper?

So you're saying that all of this nonsense ISN'T an example of a sliding definition being used in memetic warfare? Are you going to trot out the objective truth, so we can get all opinions calibrated? Please do, sir: your credibility would be helped immensely thereby.

So you're saying the basics of singular vs. plural elude you? Does this signal the onset of another of your hyper-materialist menstruations?

Understood: you got nothin'.

It's quite blatantly obvious that you've never deployed, much less served, in the military.
While service members take a generally libertarian view of what people are getting up to in private, the actual business of being in a military unit is surprisingly sex-free. The co-ed nature of line units is a policy decision foisted by Progressives.
There is a distinction to be drawn between racial integration, which makes massive sense, and co-ed units, which add zero (0) combat value to units.
If you took a truly anonymous survey of our military, I predict you'd find a plurality that, while freely admitting that they serve with some excellent ladies (I know I did) would still taper off their participation to a minimum. Because you Don't. Win. Wars. With. Social. Engineering.
Then again, our contemporary policy doesn't seem to be about winning wars. So keep the ladies around, I guess.

Nor did I.

You can say it's "rationalizing", but you understand that "we" is plural and "I" is singular?

Sunset Dr. Dobbs
Ye nattering nabobs
Who'd prefer cleanshaven
Java refactoring jobs
Burma Shave

I stand in admiration of your capacity to Make Stuff Up, then treat your own utterances as received wisdom, e.g. "Obama is a conservative President".
You are Teh Man.
Meanwhile, where is the next installment of Karl's Folly?

Whereas you've continuously clung to the moral high ground, I know.

Politics is orthogonal to individual choices. To behave as though you'd run a country like you'd run your personal life is specious.

So, you've rationalized inertia.

So you saying that Christians never claimed to be non-human. I think that's the Scientologists.