What the fuck are you talking about?

What you're saying is that if you call the company behind a closed source, they'll be happy to take your money and develop your feature?

Sounds like your employer/colleagues were pieces of shit. Doesn't necessarily mean that's the norm, or that you can't find better. But, keep on fighting the good fight, sir!

Only, McDonalds is mostly a franchise. But, yeah, sure.

You can download all of Android's sources.

Moto-blur is not Android, it's a replacement UI developed by Motorola. Which, btw, is not as easy to do in iOS (and probably a breach of contract).

But then again, that's not exactly allowed, is it?

Unless you're using the old BSD license (with the advertising clause), BSD is compatible with GPL. And as far as I know, pretty much everyone moved away from that.

That happens to me too, but what makes it especially annoying is that when I re-read, I recognize it and slowly start remembering what I read.

because they cannot track the bugs people report against the package in that piece of shit launchpad.

Zombies have bathed somewhat recently.

The odor from zombies is somewhat lower.

Overall general appearance is somewhat better for zombies.

You may mistake an OWSer for a zombie, but never vice versa.

Unlike zombies, destroying OWSer brains has no perceivable effect.

Unlike zombies, there is no actual way to placate them.

Zombies clean up after themselves when they're done making a mess.

There are fewer festering sores on zombies.

Zombies have a higher likelihood of being able to reproduce.

Zombies are capable of peaceful assembly.

With a debit card.

My point was, integrity (values/moral, figurative definition) of policemen works just as well as the literal one. If anything, integrity as being whole, seems to me would apply better to the police corps, not to an individual: intégrité, nom féminin Sens 1 Etat d'une chose qui n'a pas été altérée Chose means thing, and while you can apply this to a person, it just sounds weird. But, we're just splitting hairs here. :-P

Lazy journalism. The coldfusion stuff was made by Luis Majano, whereas the logbox the nutcase in question is talking about was made by this guy: http://www.fabioghioni.net/blog/2011/10/20/internet-e-l%E2%80%99arbitrio-assoluto-sui-dati-dei-service-provider-presentata-al-parlamento-l%E2%80%99iniziativa-per-un-sistema-di-controllo-sotto-garante/

How can you tell which of the two meanings they used? From what I see on http://dictionary.reverso.net/french-english/atteinte , it's more likely to be used with the figurative sense of intégrité.

My French is very rusty and google translate doesn't work with https (and I'm too lazy to copy paste everything by hand), but from what I saw, it has photos and names, no addresses, phone numbers or shoesize. It also had screenshots of facebook with them saying they hate non white people and similar for a couple of them.
The article is misleading, yes. But so is saying they're disclosing personal oh-so-sensitive information.