You can restore that from iCloud (or wherever you stashed the backup if it ain't an iPhone) one would think, then punch in the passcode once that's done. Pretty sure a court would allow it if the defense claims the data was already thrashed.

" Non-sugar Carbs, via calories, are why we are fat"
problem solved, thank /. poster!

Protip: It's more complicated than that.

"The idea fat people are hooked on sweets is BS."
no, it isn't. IN fact sugar can trigger a Dopamine release. In some people as much as some recreational drugs do.
  So people can be hooked on sweets.

"They are hooked on higher-calorie, denser-calorie fatty foods."
that can ALSO be true.

"I just read an asinine study the other day that incorrectly associated sweeter foods with. higher calorie intake"
that can very well be true. I don't know what study you are talking about, so I don't know the specific item they where talking about.

You can't gain more weight then calories and water.

You started paying attention to what you eat and limited intake, and exercised.

" So you eat more of it."
stop putting it in your mouth. Problem solved.

Citation?

Are you sure? the only info I can find comes from one woman making a claim. and most of that article was paywalled.

It smells of typical soda conspiracy nonsense.
References I found all link to here:
http://www.boston.com/news/loc...

Its becasue it's nonsense, and you are trolling.

" But the more significant concern is that HFCS laden foods and drinks cause one to crave more since the HFCS interferes with the "I've had enough" mechanisms that normally govern food/drink intake. "
False

"And another concern that bears repeating is that HFCS puts an increased burden on the liver and the blood glucose homeostatic mechanisms that are adapted to handling normal table sugars."

Nope.

" my personal concern is that HFCS on the label is a marker I can use to avoid foods and drinks that predispose me to exercise induced asthma problems."
Does it? or is it a bias?

Pop quiz, hot shot?
Why do those subsidies exist? what did they replace?
You don't know, do you?

That study has be taken apart many, many times.
Rats genetically engineered for something, show the thing they were genetically engineered to show. Must be the test.

Bad controls, be methodology, bad samples. Perhaps you should get a more scientific perspective?

No, the SPECULATION is that it's due to gut bacteria.

They don't even know if it's a real effect. It was 4 out of 7 people, and not with the best controls.

HFCS is real sugar. It comes from corn instead of beets or cane. You're body doesn't know the difference.

7.

Nothing to see here at this time.

Not much different from a proprietary project, except that instead of "sexy/ugly", the factor is "profitable/unprofitable".

This, right here. Even if it goes stagnant for years? If you can get (or already have) the source, you can resurrect it.

By contrast, if you wanted to resurrect, say, WinCE? Well, good luck with that.

"...workers forced to pay for their uniforms and so forth."
Where in the us is the legal?

Also, where you self employed as an agent?
OTOH, you were a real estate agent, so nothing you say is worth squat.