Sadly it seems they don't have 1-photon sensitive ccd. The article says:

They are sending single photon pulses of light repeatedly to the target position until they managed to capture one and then continue to scan the next "pixel" of the target. So this wont help with any of those things you listed.

Half of the cars I've had didn't come with ABS, ECU, airbag, security. They all did come with car radio/cassette player.

These aren't the drones you're looking for

Also it doesn't even require QR codes, you just need a link on the page with sqrl:// instead of http:/// to launch the authentication app.

I guess you didn't read the spec, no identifiable information needs to be sent.

Are you really eating more calories per day or do you just believe doing so. Did you keep track what you ate before your low-carb diet? I was on Atkins and noticed that I actually had trouble getting to 2000+kcals per day when eating stuff that was near zero carb. With high carb foods it is way too easy to reach 2000, 3000 or even 4000 kcals per day.

Too bad that FMRI isn't that accurate either:
"In 2007 on episode 93 of the TV program Mythbusters, the three members of the build team attempted to fool a non-automated fMRI test done by Cephos Corporation. Although two of the members were unsuccessful at fooling Cephos, the third member was able to successfully fool Steve Laken of Cephos, according to this member by keeping his mind in constant activity. The one out of three failure rate suggested that fMRI-based lie detection required further development"

Clever developer would allow people with 1st person view choose if they want to play with 1st person view players only or allow 3rd person view players too. And same option for 3rd person view players.

Sure sure, I was just pointing out that it is silly to demand civil unions and say that marriage is reserved for churches as if current churches wont allow gay marriage one can just create a new church that will allow it. So there is no point in doing that.

and what the point might be?

Just that if someone wants to protect the term "marriage" from gays by turning the government backed marriages into civil unions and only allowing churches to do "marriages", they will be suprised that it wont prevent gays from getting married.

If you can choose your sexuality, then why don't you try it for a week or two? This week watch straight porn and be aroused by that and then choose to be gay and watch more straight porn, it shouldn't arouse you then but gay sex should.

They would need to revoke more than just tax breaks. That is one valid way to fix the situation, just remove marriage from the laws, all of them. I wonder which one would upset the community more, adding a new group to get access to already existing laws and benefits or removing them all?

Your workaround doesn't really work, someone can just organize a new church that allows gay marriage and then gays can also get married. Not that this is a problem for me, but it might be a problem to those who are against gay marriage :)

If you allow churches to decide what is marriage, what prevents me from founding a church that allows marriage for polygamist?