there is a beautiful tale which i will share with you, which helps to explain why what Dr Stallman is doing is so important:
"the reasonable man adapts himself to the world. the unreasonable man adapts the world to himself. therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man".
now, if it wasn't for Dr Stallman, the average pathological corporation (see the first few minutes of the documentary "The Corporation") would take whatever it could get (and you only have to look at the 98% endemic GPL violations on android smartphones and tablets to see the consequences of non-GPL software such as android)
so if it wasn't for Dr Stallman sticking to his principles, you would probably be using a computer that crashes 10 to 15 times a day for anything but the most mundane of tasks, and was entirely outside of your control.
No real comparable thing exists, and to expect it is to think in the MS single-microcomputer-on-every-desk mindset. We're networked and clouded these days, so every program is a server which can interact with any other program (or should be) and a single-lump tool is limited to its black box. In the Free/Open Source world, you can get full SQL DB's or NoSQL storage engines free-at-point-of-use, so why would you grab a single solution when you can pick the components which best fit your needs?
I think you've condemned your many clients to no scalability and little flexibility. When it comes to cope with larger numbers of records, more complicated business logic or increased concurrent access, there's nothing like Access in the Free/Open Source world because the big-boy DB's are free-at-point-of-use. You then have the freedom to implement a web UI or a GTK+ UI or a QT UI talking a standard protocol and standard DB query language, and with that comes the architectural freedom to divorce the back-end from the business logic from the user interface -- which makes maintenance and ongoing improvements easy.
because if people have a right not be be offended, then there is no freedom of speech
Oh bullshit. There is a middle way, and the majority of nations have found it, including the USA. Don't be so dogmatic.
It sounds like that was said in the context of comparing to other fan-doms. Such as someone might be a Twilight fan and write some fan-fiction. She is saying, in response to something before the cut which is not shown, that her case is slightly different. She is not a fan.
To me that could even mean "I'm not a fan. I am a gamer."
In any case, I don't think it follows automatically that she does not like video games. That can only be said if the context in which she spoke is ignored, and her words taken to the letter. "Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre." applies here.
That she had to learn a lot about video games also does not mean anything, because there are many genres and games out there. Nobody has an overview without some systematic digging.
I think we can agree that she played games at some point (and thus at least was a gamer), so she can talk on the subject.
Even if she had literally said "I do not like video games" she could have been a prolific gamer, become disappointed with the industry, and stop actively playing. In that case "I do not like video games" would be a true present statement, yet she still has all right to talk on the subject of video games.
I often wonder why the community does not create more tools that abstract away the differences as much as possible.
Every distro has it's package manager and with it different syntax. Imaging if you had a tool like "install-it mysql" which on Ubuntu goes to apt-get install, or pacman's syntax, or yum or whatever.
The thing I mostly worry about is packages. Say what you will about Windows and Mac, but developing an app for them generally has a limited set of ways. There is only one way to do services in Windows, etc.
It is hard to get say Webcam apps to get ported to Linux because the poor devs have to figure out webcams in 10 different distros. Everyone in the boards say "ubuntu 14 +1",
FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis