Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Shame (Score 0) 80

Because he doesn't think it actually helps the United states to be spying on Germany our any number of other states internationally.

Its not his place to decide that - he doesn't have in-depth knowledge of just what the actual relationship is with Germany at any particular time, so he can't make the determination as to whether spying on them is helpful or not.

By exposing actions which have been going on outside of the US, targetting non-US citizens, he's working against the US - hardly the actions of a patriot, is it?

Comment Re:DirectX is obsolete (Score 1) 135

Did they fix that on Apple iOS then? I had a serious ball ache of a time backing up my SMS messages separately from my system - infact, it involved digging around in the system backup, extracting a binary file, running it through a conversion process and then saving the results into a csv. This was back in 2011/12

So it certainly seems like a phone platform with "NO API for backing up sms messages" certainly did win the market.

Comment Re:Anyone think it's about 'sex w/o a condom'? (Score 2) 197

So basically you want there to be a conspiracy theory behind it all, so you are going to twist everything and anything you can so you see a conspiracy theory...

In 2013 there were 5 EAW's issued for sexual offences. In 2012 there were 4.

The "sheer effort" in Assanges case is purely because of his own actions - once the extradition judge approves the extradition and all appeals are dealt with, the country is obliged to extradite. If the subject of the EAW absconds, its the extraditing countries obligation to find him again. In this case, they know where he is, he is there of his own volition, and there is a standing warrant for his arrest so he will be arrested when he leaves the embassy.

You don't just give up on warrants because the subject is making things difficult or expensive. If that were possible, we would see a very interesting approach by a large number of criminals.

http://www.copfs.gov.uk/foi/re...

Comment Re:Anyone think it's about 'sex w/o a condom'? (Score 4, Informative) 197

You realise that on all of the counts listed in the European Arrest Warrant, dual criminality was asserted and thus no UK judge found grounds to dismiss on the basis of lack of criminality in the offences listed?

See page 15 of the following PDF:

http://webarchive.nationalarch...

And you should also check out what the offences listed actually are, because your description is quite a way off.

The offence described as rape is as follows:

[quote]
On 17 August 2010, in the home of the injured party (SQ) in Enkoping, Assange deliberately consummated sexual intercourse with her by improperly exploiting that she, due to sleep, was in a helpless state.

It is an aggravating circumstance that Assange, who was aware that it was the expressed wish of the injured party and a prerequisite of sexual intercourse that a condom be used, still consummated unprotected sexual intercourse with her. The sexual act was designed to violate the injured party's sexual integrity.
[/quote]

Offence 4, Page 3 of the above document.

The lack of a condom used also shows up in Offence 2, Page 2, for a different injured party (AA).

How about you Assange supporters actually get your facts right about what the arrest warrant actually lays out? You can harp on about "such silly charges" but its patently obvious you have never actually read the rulings against Assange, which makes it trivial to dismiss you out of hand.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...