Comment Re:base it around my OS (Score 1) 386
IIRC, the standard deduction this year was $6900 for single payers. Pretty easy to top that via mortgage interest.
IIRC, the standard deduction this year was $6900 for single payers. Pretty easy to top that via mortgage interest.
Here, there's a fee to pay for the rain that lands on your property. It's a drainage fee - you have to pay the company that operates the storm drains to take it away.
Fellow MD resident?
Looks like the rest of your comment was truncated. Let me help:
"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. "
"Then candidate Bush referred to this as what? Something d-o-o economics. Anyone? Anyone?"
It was actually wishful thinking rather than faith. I've seen the same things you describe. I've also seen where things like this are swept under the rug forever. Then, the root cause analysis comes back and people flip shit because nothing was done about it in the past. Well, nothing other than ignore the recomendations of us morlocks...
Ah; but the guy down at the station babysitting the PLC probably wants to get his Facebook fix too -- so he hooks up a wireless USB stick and presto! The entire national WAN is now online....
And the next day, he finds a pink slip waiting for him.
And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
If what he said is true, then this is yet another (out of many) example of the courts 'creatively interpreting' (in other words, modifying it with invisible ink) the constitution.
Sure, it's a wikipedia link, but it's trivial to verify.
The underlying offense is the same. The law is written to play legalistic games.
Losing Eich is going to be the worst thing to ever happen to Mozilla, mark my words.
How is losing someone that thinks 20% of his employees are subhuman not a good thing? He hates his gay employees. He publicly admitted he is a Nazi that wants to steal their rights. He gave money to a cause that attacks them. Unless you are one of them, how can you defend his kind? Hopefully it won't be that many decades before society has progressed enough to put your kind behind bars to protect the rest of us from your intolerance.
20%? Got a citation for that, or just wishful thinking?
And yet Article 1, Section 9 makes no distinction between civil and criminal. How did the 'precedent' (pronounced 'bullshit') get set that this only refers to criminal issues?
BTW, can you be jailed for failing to pay the IRS? Makes me wonder how 'civil' that infraction is then...
Could you primitive screwheads stop dropping quotes?
Don't you feel all rich and stuff?
If speech is money, he's spending like a drunken sailor.
depends what side of the pond your on... though Palin always struck me as more retarded than constructively evil.
Agreed. That Spanish Inquisitor fellow never could do anything right.
Did somebody say "the Spanish Inquisition"?
"Except when governments are involved"
Get out of the basement. Read more widely. Go enjoy some clean, unlimited tap-water. And marvel at the magical process that keeps it that way.
It's pretty clear that someone with that kneejerk response would only be interested in rainwater and grain alcohol, Mandrake.
Hey, you hurt my feelings. I thought I always got a hat tip in the 'known and admitted trolls' category.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
