Comment Re:800 employees? (Score 1) 106
They don't test shuttle tanks in Mississippi.
They could have tested in Florida and in fact did do some testing for a 240" solid booster in south Florida and they test Centaurs in West Palm to this day.
The large space? They where building the VAB so building a production building in Florida would have been simple.
There is a good reason for it to be Louisiana instead of say AZ. But the reason that it wasn't in Florida was to spread the "wealth" around.
In many ways it isn't a bad idea if you look at maximizing the economic benefits or a program. But if you look at just the cost it adds up.
That is one of the good things about a lot of big government programs like that.
Yes they cost a lot of tax dollars but a good amount of that money gets recycled from the jobs that it creates.
You also have the RnD benefit as well.
I am not even saying that this is the worst or best way to do these projects. Just that is the way they are done.
Actually, they DID test the space shuttle tanks in Mississippi. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPTA-ET. They don't test every tank there, but they tested the early ones and they test tanks that have certain kinds of problems, such as leaks.
As for building the tanks in Florida, the Kennedy VAB in Florida is 8 acres. The Michoud facility in New Orleans is vastly larger: more than 43 acres. Saying "because they built the VAB in Florida they could have built a manufacturing facility for large scale boosters" shows little knowledge of how the tanks are produced and how much space it takes to produce them. There was an existing 43 acre facility laid out to produce large scale industrial products in LA that the government already owned. The only additional cost of putting production there was barge traffic to Mississippi/Florida. Compare that to the cost of building a new 43-acre environmentally controlled facility from scratch in Florida, and I don't think that's a trivial decision. You can convince me, but you haven't thus far.
I'll freely admit that most of the Michoud space is not currently used. Original production plans were to produce one or two tanks per month, which grossly overestimated the Space Shuttle's turnaround efficiency. In the end, much of the Michoud capacity was not needed. But if you want to make the argument that Michoud was selected wholly or even primarily as a political favor, you have more homework to do.