Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Nature Publishing Group Requires Authors to Waive "Moral Rights" to Works (chronicle.com)

cranky_chemist writes: Megan O'Neil has published a story on the Chronicle of Higher Education's website noting some unusual language in the license agreement between authors and Nature Publishing Group.

"Faculty authors who contract to write for the publisher of Nature, Scientific American, and many other journals should know that they could be signing away more than just the economic rights to their work, according to the director of the Office of Copyright and Scholarly Communication at Duke University.

Kevin Smith, the Duke official, said he stumbled across a clause in the Nature Publishing Group’s license agreement last week that states that authors waive or agree not to assert "any and all moral rights they may now or in the future hold" related to their work. In the context of scholarly publishing, "moral rights" include the right of the author always to have his or her name associated with the work and the right to have the integrity of the work protected such that it is not changed in a way that could result in reputational harm."

Nature Publishing Group claims the waivers are required to ensure the journal's ability to publish formal retractions and/or corrections.

However, the story further notes that Nature Publishing Group is requiring authors at institutions with open-access policies to sign waivers that exempt their work from such policies.

Submission + - Dropbox's new policy of scanning files for DMCA issues (arstechnica.com)

Advocatus Diaboli writes: This weekend, though, a small corner of the Internet exploded with concern that Dropbox was going too far, actually scanning users' private and directly peer-shared files for potential copyright issues. What's actually going on is a little more complicated than that, but shows that sharing a file on Dropbox isn't always the same as sharing that file directly from your hard drive over something like e-mail or instant messenger. The whole kerfuffle started yesterday evening, when one Darrell Whitelaw tweeted a picture of an error he received when trying to share a link to a Dropbox file with a friend via IM. The Dropbox web page warned him and his friend that "certain files in this folder can't be shared due to a takedown request in accordance with the DMCA."

Submission + - Full Disclosure List Reborn Under New Operator (securityweek.com)

wiredmikey writes: Less than a week after announcing that it would suspended service indefinitely due to a conflict with an unnamed security researcher and ongoing legal threats, The Full Disclosure mailing list is coming back.

Gordon Lyon (aka Fyodor), who operates several Internet security resources and other mailing lists, has created a replacement list with the blessing of John Cartwright, one of of the creators of Full Disclosure, which served as a forum for the discussion of vulnerabilities and exploitation techniques and other security topics.

Because the list is getting a fresh start and no previous subscriber information appears to be headed to Lyon, interested users will have to manually subscribe which can be done here.

"Some have argued that we no longer need a Full Disclosure list, or even that mailing lists as a concept are obsolete," Lyon said. "I disagree. Mailing lists create a much more permanent record and their decentralized nature makes them harder to censor or quietly alter in the future."

Submission + - New Dropbox Terms of Use Adds Arbitration Requirement, Prohibits Class Action

memnock writes: The Legal Genealogist has this story about Dropbox, the cloud storage company:
'... The second key change is one that has a number of Dropbox users up in arms. It’s putting in a binding arbitration section to its terms of use and a blanket bar on class action lawsuits...
... Even if you do opt out of the arbitration clause, you won’t be able to join forces with other users to sue as a group in what’s called a class action lawsuit. And you’d have to file any suit you do bring as an individual in California.'

Submission + - Moving Towards a Police State .. (therealnews.com)

An anonymous reader writes: We're basically building a police state here. We're going to be allowing, basically, unauthorized wiretapping, which we didn't even know about, the warrantless wiretapping. What they already had done was so bad that we came out against it.

Submission + - The paranoid's survival guide: Protect your privacy on social, mobile

rlinke writes: Is privacy dead? Not by a long shot. While you can't control everything that's out there about you, there's quite a bit you can do to reduce your data footprint — or at least avoid adding to it. For this series, Computerworld asked nine privacy experts for tips and tricks they use for keeping their own personal data profiles on the down low.

Whether your goal is avoiding tracking by marketers, ensuring your personal safety or protecting yourself from government surveillance, there are steps you can take to minimize your exposure both online and off, these professionals say.

Submission + - Google Blurring Distinction Between Ads, Organic Search Results (itworld.com)

jfruh writes: For years, paid links returned from Google search queries have been set off from 'real' search results by their placement on the page and by a colored background. But some users have begun to see a different format for these ads: a tiny yellow button that reads 'AD' at the end of the link is the only distinguishing feature. Google is notoriously close-mouthed about this sort of thing, but it may begin rolling the new format out to more users soon. 'Does Google want to increase its click-through rates as much as possible? Yes,' said a VP at one digital marketing agency."

Comment Found an explanation (Score 1) 5

by Soulskill (1459) Works for SlashdotAlter Relationship on Monday March 03, 2014 @01:52AM (#46385795) Homepage

We had to disable updates to most of the Slashboxes, including 'This Day on Slashdot' in order to fix an underlying issue in the code. The work should be completed soon, at which point we'll re-enable everything. Apologies for the inconvenience!

http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

Submission + - The Ukraine-Russia Cyberwar Has Already Begun (vice.com)

Daniel_Stuckey writes: Ground troops may be flexing their muscles in Crimea while they await marching orders, but cyber and information attacks between Russia and Ukraine are already underway.

Friday, a group of unidentified men took control of a series of communication centers in Crimea. Maintained by Ukrtelecom JSC, Ukraine's telecom provider, the facilities are essential to linking Crimea with the rest of Ukraine. With the hubs knocked out, landline, mobile, and internet services were severed, with almost no coverage available. It is unclear exactly who was responsible for these attacks, but considering their sophisticated and clandestine nature, it is reasonable to assume they were carried out by professionals.

On the other side of the border, RT—the news channel formerly known as Russia Today and funded by the state—had its website hacked on Sunday morning, with the word 'Nazi' not so stealthily slipped into headlines. Highlights included “Russian senators vote to use stabilizing Nazi forces on Ukrainian territory,” and “Putin: Nazi citizens, troops threatened in Ukraine, need armed forces' protection.” RT was quick to notice the hack, and the wordplay only lasted about 20 minutes.

Submission + - Oldest Piece of Earth Discovered (sciencemag.org) 1

sciencehabit writes: At 4.4 billion years old, geologists have discovered the oldest piece of Earth—a zircon crystal. The microscopic gem was found on a sheep farm in Australia and is about twice the diameter of a human hair. The finding, reported this week in Nature Geoscience, suggests that Earth’s crust formed much earlier than thought and supports the hypothesis of a “cool early Earth” that could sustain oceans and, perhaps, even life shortly after forming.

Submission + - FCC To Establish New Net Neutrality Rules (itworld.com)

itwbennett writes: The FCC won't seek further judicial review of a January court ruling that struck down the agency's net neutrality regulations, but it does plan to issue a new set of rules covering ISPs. The FCC will use the agency's existing authority to regulate broadband providers, establishing 'new rules of the road' to prevent ISPs from charging some companies more for network access, the agency said Wednesday in a media briefing, which was followed by the release of a statement from agency Commissioner Tom Wheeler. The appeals court 'invited the Commission to act to preserve a free and open Internet,' the statement said. 'I intend to accept that invitation by proposing rules that will meet the court's test for preventing improper blocking of and discrimination among Internet traffic, ensuring genuine transparency in how Internet service providers manage traffic, and enhancing competition.'

Comment "fucktard"? (Score 1) 299

Wow. First time in my 5 years here that I've encountered the word "fucktard" on /. (google lists a total of 1310 instances over the entire history of the site https://www.google.com/search?as_q=fucktard&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=slashdot.org&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gbv=1&sei=52n4Up6oI8z_oQStwYL4Bg ) Looks like there is something here to defend.

Submission + - Who ate the Pear? 1

PuceBaboon writes: Speculation is rife in the Linux community concerning the fate of Pear OS, the popular OS X lookalike distribution. The distribution disappeared a couple of weeks back, with a message implying that the project had been bought "by a very large company" appearing briefly on the web site (which is no longer available... archived courtesy of the WayBackMachine).
LinuxInsider is carrying an article with a nice round-up of the various theories and opinions as to its fate.

Slashdot Top Deals

To do nothing is to be nothing.

Working...