Again, I'm not being negative. I'm saying that the phrasing and usage is deceptive (the whole Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics thing).
And I acknowledge that solar has achieved new milestones in adoption. For that, I'm glad.
What I'm saying is that trying to compare it to another power generation sector that's producing 40-50x the power is misleading.
For Solar to be a truly major contender, they need at least an order of magnitude in growth. And I'm somewhat pessimistic that the US can actually achieve that level of growth. Even over a longer term.
As for "total renewable energy". I'm just going to laugh derisively and leave it at that. Quite simply, with our ever-growing energy demands, renewable energy quite simply CANNOT support the entire energy industry. You could carpet the US in PV cells and toss up solar thermal and wind farms willy nilly, and it still wouldn't cover it.
Geothermal and Hydro *might* cover baseload "right now". But remember that we're pretty much at peak hydro in the US right now, for environmental reasons. And geothermal isn't something you can just drop everywhere. So they can't grow to keep up with demand.
Realistically, some sort of solution that includes nuclear is our best option.
Sure, nuclear is dirty in its own way. But it's a way that can be managed and minimized. And you're not blowing the byproducts up a stack and into the environment.