Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:mdsolar again (Score 1) 147

More expensive because your little horse in the race has a ton of subsidies.
Without them, solar's a VERY expensive beast to push.

As for proliferation. You run more than one reactor. So you burn down any and all byproducts until you essentially have lead.

As for less stable.

Explain stability issues in a liquid fueled molten salt reactor.

Explain how this is better than burning fossil fuels in the megatons every year and blowing most of the waste up a smokestack and into the environment...

Yes, the final byproducts of a fission system tend to be nasty and short lived or long-lived and relatively harmless. But they CAN be contained.

You know what "contains" the stuff the fossil fuel companies blow into the atmosphere?

Nothing. MAYBE outer space. But other than that...nothing.

So, pick your poison. Something you can lock away for a couple hundred years and be done with it, or breath it in over the course of your lifetime.

Comment Re:Correction: (Score 1) 338

Fortunately, in this case, it's what someone who's sick of BOTH "parties" is saying because he wants the entire group of game-players, pork farmers and pretty much ANYONE deeply entrenched in the political process stripped of their job, and have the jobs handed to people who actually want to do the damn job the way it's supposed to be done.

We might have to go through several ENTIRE crops of candidates and basically cripple the government for a few years, but, in the end, the message is sends is this.

"The party's over. Get back to fucking work."

Comment Re:Correction: (Score 1) 338

No.

This is surgery. In some cases, with a wound, you can clean it out and it'll heal up nicely.

But, sometimes, it's bad enough that you basically just need to excise the whole thing, till you have nothing but healthy tissue.

That's what needs to happen here.

They all need to go. All the game-players, and special-interest pork farmers. ALL OF THEM.

You don't leave any behind to reinfect the wound.

We can then drop in an entire group new guys and be EXPLICIT about why they now have their jobs and the the other guys are now holding "Will legislate 4 food" signs.

You MIGHT have to do it a couple times. And yeah, it'd be disruptive as hell. But, eventually, the message would be gotten.

Comment Re:No alternatives. (Score 1) 257

The only way to flee is to have an alternative. And despite all of the wanna-bes, there are no real quality alternatives.

Contrary to popular belief, "do without" IS an alternative.
Just, in this day and age, it's a very self-limiting, "cut off your nose to spite your face" alternative. As the only one who continues to be hurt is you.

Comment Re:Correction: (Score 3, Interesting) 338

Sorry, but if all sides are gigantic, lying pricks, I honestly don't care to stand around dicksizing just so I can declare THE most gigantic, lying prick.

I want them gone. All of them. GONE.

The fact that you're still willing to weigh them against one another shows that you still have some growing to do and some brainwashing to flush out.

Comment Re:Correction: (Score 5, Insightful) 338

In other words, he's being a Republican.

No you jackass. He's being a politician.

Republican, Democrat, WHATEVER, they're all saying the same thing to you (whatever they think will make you vote for them) now, and doing whatever the fuck they can to maximize benefit to their personal pocket book later.

If you think this is somehow mitigated by party affiliation, you REALLY need to stop abusing your prescriptions and hike your way out of fantasy land.

Comment Re:Drop solar heat for direct conversion (Score 1) 521

Nuclear plants can't be used to adjust production on the fly, it's a baseline production.

Uh yeah. That's the point. You build a baseline system with nuclear.
Then augment it with renewables like existing Hydro, and the growing solar, wind and geo to smooth out peaks in demand.

One can't just start or stop the nuclear reactor in a few minutes or even an hour of response time to answer for power increase or decrease of fluctuating renewable source.

One can, however, build a nuclear baseline that meets the majority of needs and use other forms of power (preferably ones that don't release CO2 back into the atmosphere) for peak power.

(I also remind that emergency shutdown of a nuclear reactor is quite bad for its components)

Keeping some NG plants handy while increasing renewable sources is actually a pretty good deal.

Sure it is. For the NG suppliers.

Also, how is a shutdown "bad for its components" in something like a molten salt reactor?
Oh that's right. It isn't. It's a simple, gravity-driven process that IMMEDIATELY shuts down the reaction. And there's no water to superheat and cause explosions.

Sorry, but if you think you can run the country on just renewables plus NG, you're insane.

Slashdot Top Deals

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...