Comment That's a function of the facts. (Score 1) 289
The evidence against him and his co-conspirators is large enough that some mistake it for a kangaroo court.
The evidence against him and his co-conspirators is large enough that some mistake it for a kangaroo court.
Then forget any sensitive work. Tracing it to you will only make it easier to deny a security clearance.
The cars will be glorified Trabants with the same attention to detail. This will continue to mean a lack of uptake without government force.
When American sized (read: large) alternative fueled cars are as affordable as their predecessors, they'll have a chance against regular cars.
Had it been a woman, it'd have been 18 months.
Get rid of the benefit-dodging agencies that negatively affect productivity to obtain disposability.
Both secondary sources rely on material that is unverifiable - the unauthorized disclosures.
The Equation Group
Unfounded accusations that don't hold up under independent scrutiny (read: they rely on unauthorized disclosures by Snowden).
No, the 9th circle is reserved for Snowden.
Those who defend him would probably be in a lesser circle, if unrepentant.
N/T
China stands to gain too much to not be involved. That's their primary way of technological development - industrial/governmental espionage.
Perhaps they could start explaining how Nortel ended up becoming Huawei and ZTE, amongst other things. Then they could also explain why Huawei has a LOT of ties to the PRC government.
Huawei is not only selling networking gear but quickly becoming an all-encompassing IT behemoth with only two problems to solve in order to be the one-and-only, neither of which will last forever: bad press in international markets and a too slowly growing (for Huawei's pace) internal market.
For nations that have seen the truth (US and Australia), they've rightfully limited their presence.
Currently the likes of IBM have only two clear paths: join ventures with Chinese companies (no other way to get into China), get the money today and hope for the better for tomorrow, or not going into China and just perish in ten to fifteen years -oh! and still letting go today's money to other companies that go with option 'A'.
There's a third option - survive by using a combination of influence over the US(to handle Door A folks) and business strategy to minimize the Chinese threat.
American designs don't sell.
The folks at Chrysler-Fiat would like to have a word with you, accentuated with the growl of an engine with all cylinders present.
People don't like huge ugly cars with poor cornering and badly fitting parts made of inferior materials and they prefer their cars to actually fit in parking spots.
Well, people don't like being duped about important aspects of the car, such as the engine. Faked audio and turbochargers won't make up for an underpowered car.
If Ford would try to sell their American models elsewhere in the world they would go bankrupt.
The environmental laws over there are to blame.
Given how Ford has eviscerated any American qualities from their lineup, the feature was already there - by virtue of their golfcart-like engines and European form factors. The only thing that Ford had to do was add a camera.
Deliver to everyone with all the original features, including face recognition, and let the chips fall where they may.
As for the hate, thank Google's broken dependence invite system. That needs to be forced out of Google by some means.
Those shouldn't be abandoned for long if space technology goes further back than Apollo.
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken
