The only entities recognizing it are with Russia. The rest of the world sees it for what it is, Russian-occupied Ukraine.

Such a case seems ironic given that this is the same university that was (recently) involved in a scandal related to such crime.

Not everyone is more suited to running a business than working for one. Taking your advice would be worse than taking Corley's.

The real reason is that the employers can keep them from moving from one employer to the next - without any thought to morale beyond threats of pulling their visa.

If you're treating someone that badly that money would not prevent departure, not training them only makes things worse.

You think that the employer is entitled to perfection while the people working for them have to do all the heavy lifting. That is, the employer gets a pass to make arbitrary decisions on requirements while you expect the workers to forgo economies of scale that could be attained through employer-sponsored training.

You are part of the problem and deserve whatever comes your way.

It's one more reason that temporary work (or any similar third party) should not be a condition of accepting/continuing a job.

That is, if you want to be temporary, the company has to make it a competitive advantage (and by virtue of that, greater expense) to go the third party/contractor route.

No program of such nature ends up working as you intend. They are only used to deny people any ability to think/act in the long term.

The guest workers can be paid whatever wage, but their lower level of freedom makes them desirable to businesses.

That, and some companies will link severance to non-disclosure of the offshoring/guest worker programs.

No, since their existence is to undermine citizens with a supplicant labor pool. To agree with their existence is un-American in the most possible way.

The only way to fix it is to rip out every single immigration law down to pre-1965 statutes and regulations. Then "handle" the lobbyists that defend a practice that has invited fraud and abuse for as long as it ever existed.

Who says that no-questions, no-touch freight has to come from a major carrier?

Then again, this is Volvo, not BMW.

For a device that has still yet to reach the public at large, it's odd to see such a document from *anyone*.

That said, it'd be kind of nice to see this at least be available at large to shake these kinds of issues out.

Given the size, tape would not be necessary; they would just break the connection of the LED.

With the US, they would have considered more possibilities of how to handle disasters.

With China, it's mostly about the events that generate PR (and thus face-saving) value. The lunar rover's construction is considered an afterthought except for getting it to the desired event.

Until he and/or his accomplices(including Greenwald, who may face additional charges if he attempts to sneak in under a false identity) are facing charges in a US court, none of can be taken as truth.

Taking the NSA's word is more reliable, especially when they've been more open than Snowden has been about the entire matter. The only mistake that has been made is the lack of aggressive pursuit to clean up loose ends.

Modding this down the memory hole makes it no less true.

Suggesting that we should have a Constitutional blind spot for surveillance only leaves room for people to go undetected.

It's not been a problem for the entire history of the NSA to do what they do until one of their folks becomes disgruntled enough to sell their country out.