Comment Re:Take it to the extreme (Score 1) 468
This would seem to be Airbus's long game. They already prefer the pilots just set the autopilot and handle the radio. It's not hard to imagine them attempting to build a fully automated airliner. Getting the FAA on board will be a different matter however.
A lot of people look at the AF447 disaster as a case study in not disconnecting the pilots from the aircraft quite so much because when they're suddenly thrust back into control unexpectedly, they end up with a ramp up time before they're fully aware of the state of the aircraft and know what they need to do. If this takes too long the aircraft will crash. I think Airbus took home the opposite message: In the event of sensor failure the autopilot needs to switch to a failsafe flight mode (throttle up 10%, pitch up the nose a couple of degrees, warn the pilots) instead of disengaging. Once they have the autopilot able to handle all airline emergency situations (at least you had better hope they get all of them) and work out any ATC issues then there's little need for human pilots.
A lot of people look at the AF447 disaster as a case study in not disconnecting the pilots from the aircraft quite so much because when they're suddenly thrust back into control unexpectedly, they end up with a ramp up time before they're fully aware of the state of the aircraft and know what they need to do. If this takes too long the aircraft will crash. I think Airbus took home the opposite message: In the event of sensor failure the autopilot needs to switch to a failsafe flight mode (throttle up 10%, pitch up the nose a couple of degrees, warn the pilots) instead of disengaging. Once they have the autopilot able to handle all airline emergency situations (at least you had better hope they get all of them) and work out any ATC issues then there's little need for human pilots.