When you say 'right', I think you mean freedom. Do you?

Of course, when we apply game theory to the current fiat dollar system, there's absolutely no way anyone can cheat.

Your definition of a false dichotomy is different than what I understood and also different to Wikipedia's.

A false dilemma (also called black-and/or-white thinking, bifurcation, denying a conjunct, the either-or fallacy, false dichotomy, fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, the fallacy of false choice, the fallacy of the false alternative, or the fallacy of the excluded middle) is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

I'm proposing a that the focus should be put towards a third option, making the game fun which is different than game play and graphics quality.

The focus on graphical quality over game play,

You'd think that they would know this by now. Dong Nguyen has over 170,000 followers on Twitter for a good reason and it's not the graphical quality of Flappy Bird and neither is it game play. It's the fun factor.

fuck beta

I understand what it is designed to solve but is there any evidence on how well it solves these problems? Do you know of any videos or benchmarks pitting Wayland against X?

I'm dying to find out whether Wayland is faster and smoother than X. Anyone have any evidence?

There was a free exchange of goods and both parties involved won because they were both better off after the transaction. What's the point of having the government force an adjustment to an already perfect transaction in favour of one party and taking a cut in the process? Sounds to me that doing such a thing would be loss for everyone except government employees.

I have never met a libertarian who wanted anything for free. Quite the opposite. They want everyone to pay for what they use and don't want anyone to get a free ride because they know that a free ride is often at someone else's expense.

I send my kids to public school because my money has already been stolen to pay for it and I can't afford to pay double to send them to another school.

DARPA and CERN? The trillions have already been spent so no one knows what would have happened with that money in the private sector. This is all besides the point though. No matter how great you think the M16 is, the money was stolen to produce it and that's immoral.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

It's their (billionaire's) money. They can do whatever they want with it as long as they don't hurt anyone else. Government money though is stolen money. Stealing people's money to fund a pet science project is immoral and I don't support it.

* Changing X will have absolutely no effect on Y since I don't know any place where Y references X.

Not really a lie when using a functional language.

Poor analogy. They propose to use Public money and that is money taken by force.

Oh, it's coming. http://www.usdebtclock.org/

I agree. It took a while but Harper is starting to prove himself. Freetrade agreements with Europe and South Korea and with more countries in the works. Great moves for the economy and wealth building.

What about Hyundai and Kia? I'm looking forward to paying less for a car.