Comment Re:Could be improved (Score 2) 907
Maybe they could make it in the form of a green LED armband so you can always tell how much more car time you have!
Maybe they could make it in the form of a green LED armband so you can always tell how much more car time you have!
The little old lady wouldn't have to know about it. She sends in a background check for the bagger, it comes back saying Something Bad because he's on the government's naughty list, and the little old lady doesn't hire the guy and yet doesn't have any idea a Do Not Hire list exists.
There are conspiracy theories swirling about a "Do Not Hire" list that will flag otherwise innocent people in a background check if they're on the government's naughty list. It's possible at least...but what are the odds that EVERY job this guy applied to ran a check that could be exploited?
The war on Freemasonism has already been done:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The war on Establishmentarianism should be fun!
I can't believe this. My company buys Dells by the dozen and we've never ever received a dud.
In other places where electricity is many times more expensive than in the US however, it will pay itself off many times faster!
Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!
I'm assuming you mean "how many phones are vulnerable."
Only Nokia's N-series phones running Maemo, or Android phones with a Linux chroot are capable of running bash or sshd (without crazy hardcore modding).
I'm trying to figure out if the OpenSSH vectors are actually remote exploits or just a privilege escalation in a remote access tool. From what I understand, a user has to be authenticated to get access to any of the variables this exploit can run through.
Well now he has to do it. And you know he's gonna do it shirtless.
One car per household may mean one job per household, and that hasn't been sustainable for a loooong time.
On one hand the US is using an incredible amount of energy and they need to clean it up, the barriers to that are almost purely political. It's economically and technologically feasible.
On the other hand, China doesn't have to develop itself on coal. Again, clean energy can be just as cheap. Oil is only getting more expensive and renewable is only getting cheaper. And China's heavily authoritarian government doesn't have to be held back by silly political whims.
When renewable advocates boast about energy production, the numbers are inevitable inflated by huge amounts of biomass, or meaningless capacity numbers which do not represent actual energy delivered. Leveling forests to burn for fuel is not environmentally friendly, and not even carbon neutral on the time scales that matter. In some cases, forests are pelletized and shipped over seas, making the carbon impact even worse than burning coal. Unfortunately, aside from hydro, it is the only renewable that is reliable, and thus forms an integral part of "renewable" plans. More typically though, coal and gas take up the slack.
Read more about Australia specifically, or bioenergy in general. Sadly there is only one form of clean energy that is environmentally friendly and scalable, and the renewable fanatics will have nothing to do with it, instead promoting a world of poverty and mass environmental devastation. While solar and wind have their place, it would be much more effective to complement them with nuclear instead.
Doesn't matter, had profits
The commenters didn't file a suit against him, they just said things on the Internet, so the right to face his accusers is not applicable here.
He's suing for the business to reveal information on their customers, nothing more. He can then try to file a suit against those customers for saying mean things leading to him losing his job, but it wouldn't be smart.
Hey now, the analytical engine could be programmed by anyone without signing an agreement with Babbage and paying him $100 per year. No reason the punch cards couldn't be GPL-licensed either.
No amount of careful planning will ever replace dumb luck.