Authenticate based on "activities the user normally perform" ?

Aren't Google, Facebook and advertisers already tracking our every move ? And figuring out when people come back to visit a site ?

I'm sure you can identify people that way, but can it really be secure ?

Java is Dead. Netcraft confirms.

And Steve Jobs already knew it...

But come on, who didnt see this coming ?

The differences between Android and iPhone are: (AFAIK)

- There are much less of these APIs on the iPhone than Android (eg: I dont think there is any API to access your email from an iPhone App, or make phone call or SMS without user confirmation)

- Android's user confirmation is at install, while iPhone's user confirmation is when the app try to use a particular API for the first time (eg: when it tries to use location) And the app can keep running even if the user denies it the right to use a specific service.

All in all, the iPhone security scheme is much more conservative, with the side effect that you cant do as many things in an iPhone app as you could in an Android App. For example, you could probably write an android app to could automatically navigate phone menus (eg: "For billing press 1" kind of things) while this is probably not possible for iPhone.

Apple is betting that their conservative approach will be more appealing for users if they dont have articles like this one coming out. Google is betting that their open approach will be more appealing to developers, but if more article like this come out, Android will become like windows security wise. It does not matter if it is true, or if it is a matter of user giving permissions, its all a matter of perception.

But you see, the whole point of having flash on phones was so that you could really get the "full" web, and that developers dont have to redo all their work.

Now, most of the flash content is not designed for touch input and phones screens, so you still cant really access that content on a phone in a meaningful way. (I tried to use the FIFA World Cup Matchcast flash app on a droid, not really usable). Developers will have to redesign their flash sites for phones anyway.

They might as well spend their time writing an apps, or an HTML5 site.

Some existing flash apps might work well enough on android tablets, but where are these now?

Given that Google, MSFT, Opera, Mozilla and Apple are all behind HTML5, if you were a developer, which way would you go? As an individual developer what skills are you more likely to want to develop at this point to differentiate yourself?

Now I'm just waiting for Netcraft to confirm that Flash is dying...

The Queen of England

God save her from programmers!

The point of the story is that they release their driver source code, under the GPL.

So you dont care about binary compatibility, you just recompile the driver for every version of the kernel you need....

And you can fix the source code incompatibilities yourself if they ever happen and they dont keep up.

But they are not going to have to spend time and money trying to design a chip that will be able to be used in 10 different products.

See, from my own experience, SoC companies pack more features in their SoC so that they can fit in several products or markets. Apple will only worries about their own devices.

In short, Qualcomm is trying to please 5 or 6 different handsets manufacturers with their snapdragon, each with their own ideas and requests, and they will have to make compromise, while Apple can just focus on getting the exact chip they want for their products.

Prop 66 warning: This land is known to the State of California to move and cause destruction.

This warning has now to be on display for all real property in California.

Seriously, we should warn everybody living on earth that they should get out because they might be struck by an earthquake, a tsunami, a volcano eruption, a tornado,...

At some point some unencrypted content is going to be flowing in some memory for some video codec to decode... thats when you snatch it, and put it on bittorrent....

The only way to fight that now is to track content with individual watermarks and get the lawyers after the guys who are copying.... its going to end up being cat and mouse game to defeat the watermarks, but it would be a lot more scary for the copiers... you never know if you might have left some fingerprints when copying...

The exact same scheme was introduced last year... It had some other fancy name I think... Looks like its going nowhere....

I believe I can do VPN on iPhone through 3G.... why cant you ?

iPhone:
  How can a company be prepared to invest into a platform that can change at any time, cutting you off and kicking you out, with no course of action but to whine on some no-name blog

Android:
  How can a company be prepared to invest into a platform that is immature and whose app store is a wild west nightmare.

Well, choose your poison...

Just to confirm my thought:

78% of americans own a cell phone:
http://www.itfacts.biz/78-of-americans-own-cell-phones/11802

28% of american population own a passport
http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2003/01/31/how_many_america.php
(according to the 2008 GAO report)

So basically they show that their car can learn by copying some known process in addition to their physics model.

Yet I'm curious to know how the car decide that they should use the learned process rather than their model. I mean, if they learned this parking maneuver on gravel, and tried that on slick pavement, anybody would probably fail. Can this car actually do better? I would be curious to see if the car can learn a maneuver in some given conditions and repeat it in slightly different conditions.

What you see is Market Share.

The report is about Sales (of new phones).

Nobody claim that Android phones have more market share than iPhones (which have been selling for almost 3 years now)...