Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Good luck with that! (Score 1) 361

The way to preserve your savings over the long term is to dump the Federal Reserve Note, which they are steadily eroding in value, and switch to something else that the Fed can't run off a printing press.

Yes, like shares invested in the S&P 500, whose real value in 2010 was 50x (5000%) that of its 1950 value. (graph) Certainly an improvement over gold, whose real price compared to its 1950 value has ranged in various years from 55% to 450%. (graph)

Ubuntu

Are Power Users Too Cool For Ubuntu Unity? 798

darthcamaro writes "There are a lot of us that really don't like Unity. Ubuntu Founder Mark Shuttleworth defended Unity today, arguing that even 'cool' power users should like usability and ease of use. Then again he admitted that some of us are just too cool even for Unity. 'There is going to be a crowd that is just too cool to use something that looks really slick and there is nothing we can do for them,' Shuttleworth said. 'Fortunately in Ubuntu there are tons of options and lots of choice and ways to skin the cat.'"

Comment Re:Carter is Republican scapegoat for islam hate (Score 3, Informative) 812

I got my information from history books with a neutral point of view that were reviewed for accuracy.
...
Ronald Reagan is vilified for the Iran-Contra Scandal in which it is said that he traded weapons in exchange for getting the Hostages released. But if what you said was true, and Carter negotiated the release before Reagan took office, then the whole Iran=Contra scandal is false.

Good god. In Iran-Contra, the Reagan administration facilitated the sale of arms to Iran in the hope of freeing hostages in Lebanon taken from 1982 onward, years after the Iranian hostage crisis.

So what history books have you been getting your information from?

Comment Re:I said "Government owns everything" (Score 1) 873

The ratings failed because the mathematical foundations of the system failed. Portfolio theory is not a panacea. Government economists would have used the same math to arrive at the same results.

Really? Remember this?

From an April 2007 instant-message exchange between two S&P employees:

Rahul Dilip Shah: 'btw -- that deal is ridiculous'

Shannon Mooney: 'I know right ... model def does not capture half of the risk'

Shah: 'we should not be rating it'

Mooney: 'it could be structured by cows and we would rate it'

Shah: 'but there's a lot of risk associated with it -- I personally do not feel comfy signing off as a committee member'

That suggests that the math didn't mislead the ratings agencies -- they ignored the math in order to make more money.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...