Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment It's just a politial stunt... (Score 1) 648

The Governor (and legislators) know that the funds will never be approved. They're just building support with their constituents while waiting for a judge to shoot it down just so they run around blaming 'activist judges' and the ACLU for being un-American and anti-Christian and generally distract everyone from the real problems and issues.

The anti-public-money-for-the-ark people will claim a "win" when in reality they've just become the a political target that the Governor (and legislature) can point to and yell "Look! Liberal boogie men trying to abolish American Christianity! Vote for me and I'll save you!".

Meanwhile, the smart people, the entrepreneurs, will be busy printing t-shirts and buttons with the slogans 'Save our Ark!' and 'Keep America Free' and make a small fortune off of everyone else.

Comment Re:Interesting (Score 1) 779

We've already seen this problem with technology "altering" people's perceptions. Back during the Nixon/Kennedy debates, the radio listeners thought that Nixon won the debate whereas the TV viewers thought that Kennedy won the debate. Perception defines reality. Fast forward to the world wide web and we often see information being propagated ahead of the actual truth. Sound bites, images and situations are taken out of context to create drama, and that drama takes on a life of its own as people "believe" the drama over the actual truth.

Perception defines reality, and technology has made it faster and easier to ignore the "truth" be it religious or factual, while creating a mis-truth in its place. An example of which would be commenting on an article without actually having RTFA. How can you discuss the merits of the contents of an article, if no one has RTFA but still comments anyway? If everything is slightly to grossly off-topic or irrelevant to what was actually in the article, what kind of "truth" is being created?

Comment CPU Neutrality? Hardware based CrippleWare? (Score 1) 832

3rd party software vendors could pay Intel and Microsoft to enable additional CPU resources when their software is running. Advertise and sell incredibly "cheap" CPUs, advertise and sell "cheap" software, and let users pay for a "premium" upgrade to get better app performance. It would take the CrippleWare concept to a whole new level. =P

Comment Re:Horny Chinese (Score 1) 371

And did you also notice that a lot of the people in the demo/model had western looks and clothing? I'm thinking that the demo/modeling software was a Western app, or that a Western design firm or Western advertising firm put it together.

Comment Re:Joking? Satire? (Score 2, Interesting) 266

You missed a step. Politicians start to define what companies must use a .xxx domain. In the US I can easily see some politician putting forth a bill requiring that gay dating sites, abortion information sites, and sex education sites must use the .xxx domain.

Soon followed by lawsuits against ISPs for not blocking the .xxx domain.

And just so they don't fall out of the spotlight, the RIAA/MPAA require that any site that sells music or movies is required to use a .validIP suffix. Any music or movies downloaded or made available on a non .validIP site will automatically be assumed to be willfully engaging in copyright violations.

Comment Word Processors are holding us back... (Score 2, Interesting) 511

IME, word processors (such as Word) are the main impediment to the paperless office. The general problems are: they're based on the 8.5 x 11" paper paradigm, they contain unstructured data, and they're too difficult to share, search, and otherwise organize electronically. I use MS-Word at work, so my examples/complaints will be specific to Word. The issues I have with Word in how it impedes a paperless office are:

  • My monitor isn't 8.5 x 11 in size. This is especially problematic on a 22" monitor, especially when monitors nowadays are much wider than they are tall.
  • Scrolling through a document is painful. It unexpectedly jumps to the next page in page view mode. If you view the document in draft mode, which scrolls smoothly, picture objects aren't displayed.
  • Margins in Word docs are painfully contrived. They artificially limit how much text can appear on each line. Margins are based on an 8.5" wide page, which leaves even more of my 22" monitor's real estate unused. By comparison, an html based doc (aka web sites) will easily expand/contract to match your browser's window size.
  • Word docs are not Web pages. In our situation, any word doc available on a web server cannot be displayed in a web browser. Instead, you have to download the doc and then open it in Word. Needless to say this is extremely clumsy, slow, and bookmark unfriendly. Instead of being able to create a fast loading bookmark, folks tend to print out a paper copy of the document for convenience. Since folks rely on downloaded or printed copies, updates to the source document on the website are very slow to propagate (meaning that folks continue to use the out of date copy.)
  • Word docs are slow and clumsy to version control and to diff.
  • It's easier to email a document around than it is to peer review a Word document using the built in change tracking or to use peer review software. End result is several copies of a document floating around, and no good way to reconcile the copies.
  • Word docs are databases. Unfortunately, the data in a Word doc is too unstructured and very difficult, if not impossible, to reliably enforce order on the data contained therein. This also makes it difficult to search across documents. This especially impacts engineering, requirements, and policy documents. That kind of data would be better off in a real database and not "managed" in Word docs.
  • Word is bloated and slow to load. A website page can load in a couple of seconds. Word is slow to load to the point that it's often faster just to pick up the printout and read it instead.

IMO, the paperless office isn't going to happen until Someone(tm) manages to replace the word processor with a database that looks and acts like a word processor. Kind of like how everyone can use a fax machine (which acts like a telephone and copier) but those same folks balk at using a computer scanner and email over tcp/ip even though the fax machine is simply a low quality scanner that uses an inflexible, low speed modem instead of a tcp/ip network connection.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...