Of course string theory simulations are going to be correct because the theories were reversed engineered to fit the "solution," which is why there are so many string theories. ....
That's the point I'd like to make. I think we are hamstrung by the people who came up with the math but lack the vision to find a simple way to explain it. I think string theory and a lot of Quantum is very flawed as a coherent model, and a lot of weird metaphysics could be explained if we visualized these processes better.
Instead of 2d or 1d structures in our Universe -- let's act like we are seeing everything in 4D (because of course, that's the ONLY way we can experience them -- 3D + Time). So if we see one particle that bounces around between two points in a predictable way -- but it's never in both points or in-between; maybe that's our clue that it is one object with an additional dimension we can't experience. How many should be deduce-able by it's pattern and positions -- a kaleidoscope on a plane would mean six, and perhaps 7 would mean it could appear at two points at the same time, and alternate with other points seemingly at random.
Personally, I'd go with 3 groups of 4 dimensions, because it makes it all so much easier. Our 4 Dimensional objects have a higher and lower grouping only one aspect of which we interact with at any time. Space is yet another group of 4 Dimensions that we only interact with via Gravity -- but we experience gravity as a side effect of space being pushed around us. EM fields are a feedback on gravity.
I had a headache thinking about how you get something from nothing, and then again trying to resolve relativity in more than a few vectors, and then finally dealing with why we have electrical charges in the first place. I currently think that Charge has something to do with Time and the electron is slightly in the future, the proton in the past (making the electron a smaller mass that SEEMS to be moving more, but is less fixed in space/time -- again, all particles are folded fields and they exist as an exchange between to separate sets of dimensions).
It's actually easiest to explain why charges attract if you imagine there is only one particle that comprises the entire Universe. Every tick of time, it has to take up every position. And the flow of time would have to be the order of transposition of overlapping fields. Thus, time can be created by wave-forms in space -- even if they all happen instantaneously. Think of an ocean where all potential ripples are represented and form it's distorted shape. If you trace a current ripple, it's origin would face the convex side of the waveform (vice versa for it's future). Thus a continuous line reaching forward and back in time could be drawn. Of course, there's no reason that this instantaneous waveform can't evolve over "time" that it virtually created out of nothing -- because there is nothing to keep track of the waveform and potential except the interaction of the waveforms.
OK, maybe that's confusing to some people, but all of creation can happen without time, in an instant, with one particle -- and the math can work out. -- And there is probably a way to fit that to current physical theories but I'm proposing it as thought experiment. But I also find it hard to DISPROVE, as well.