Thank you for pointing out the AC's idiocy... People think that interference YOU CAN HEAR wouldn't be captured... LOL.

Talk about braindead in math and science. Surely you can calm down your rant and think objectively for one moment that sounds out of the range of human hearing cannot be heard by a human, and interference caused by sound outside the range of human hearing affects sound that IS in the range of human hearing. The result being that it is captured during conversion, and preserved based upon your compression methodology.

Most people outside of the southeast use the term "barbecuing" to mean the same thing as grilling. Oddly enough though they use the term BBQ usually to mean what people in the midwest and texas refer to as BBQ.

For example, 20 years ago, virtually no one outside of the southeast referred to pulled pork as BBQ. For most people it meant ribs, or in Texas - brisket, or quite often chicken (not smoked chicken.) Interestingly, Hawaiians have Kalua pork which is roughly equivalent, but doesn't use a barbecue.

I think you mean to say "welcome death gratefully."

True, but which one are we more likely to consume with our steak? Now if only pizza had these colon cancer causing properties and I'd have an excuse to drink beer 'round the clock...

1997 called and wants its comment back...

I'm not saying he himself is religious, but I am saying that the reason he is clearly not afraid to espouse stupidity in the face of science without fear of repercussion is because his base support is anti-science due to religion.

There's a much simpler solution. Ban political parties.

Abolish the entire concept of them/us.

Then you can finally have people who can be fiscally conservative and socially liberal, or vice versa, or a "Democrat" who can be anti-abortion, or a "Republican" who can be pro-choice, et cetera, ad nauseum.

Let centrists re-emerge from the wilderness, and the crazies fall of the scene.

Since when did right wing nut jobs label themselves "libertarians"? Do they actual know what Libertarianism actually is? They seem to have it confused with being conservative.

It is coming from the church dish, and their broadcasting stations and their "universities", and the "Faith Based Initiatives" funding, and from corporate giants like Tyson - it's scary how badly these people (adherents of dominionism) want to remake America into "Christian America." They absolutely despise the separation of church and state. They re-invent phrases like "secular humanism", "liberty", and "freedom" to mean things that those words do not actually mean.

There is a river of money at these people's fingertips and they, unlike most Christians, believe that not only should they tie politics to their religion but that they must ingrain the two. They believe in a Christian sharia. The irony is that many of them disagree theologically, but are united by a hatred of the separation of church and state.

They're just as crazy as those who want to impose Islamic sharia.

I think that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard considering that he was under zero pressure (as opposed to asking a beauty pageant contestant about quantum gravitation and recording the gurgles...)

It's so dumb it is actually depressing.

What does this have to do with a religious perversion of democracy?

...Christianity.

Please note that I didn't say blame Christianity, or fundamentalists, I said blame dominionism.

Their goal is to subvert and abuse the very words people use to describe things like 'science' (i.e. 'historical science'), 'liberty', and 'freedom.' They want nothing to do with science and they're spending amazing amounts of money electing people who are willing to espouse their causes - anything to get elected.