Comment they won't block stackoverflow though because... (Score 1) 78
Their out-sourcing industry would go under...
Their out-sourcing industry would go under...
Gods no, I like *nix the way it is. Windows IS the honeypot.
I don't know... Spaghetti is pretty good.
Indeed.
A zealot in any shape or form is narrow minded.
"A zealot is someone who won't change their mind, or change the subject..."
Sorry, the radar was in operational service, and was also fitted to the F-15 which was flying, but not deployed to combat units yet.
I think you mean at least *2 years AFTER NATO fighters*, lol.
In 1973 F-15s had it in operational use.
The Air Superiority mission will retain a pilot for a long time. Recon/Air-to-Ground/Resupply - these will all be primarily remote operated (they're often automated now.)
Why aren't weapon systems modular allowing for easy upgrade? No money in that?
They are modular, and explicitly intended for upgrades. Easy? That depends upon your definition of 'easy' - if you don't mind spending money, it's easy.
And why use human pilots for combat craft, a drone could accelerate and turn under massive G forces and still function where a human would black out.
Response time, situational awareness, the difficulty is maintaining a connection during electronic warfare, et cetera, ad nauseum. I think that there are quite a few mission profiles that would suite remote operation, but air superiority isn't one of them (not yet.)
1st: make a fast, sturdy air frame with a reliable engine, 2nd make all electronics and weapons modular easy to replace and upgrade, 3rd get rid of the human.
Like the WOPR?
Word
It would make it simpler to realize if they're just taking the piss or really are as stupid as what they write... (Although I've seen some quality AC posts as well.)
Who said they could assume they could?
I said there's very little reason to think they would not be able to.
That's a very important distinction logically.
Why would there be little reason to think that? Aside from all the expenses of homeschooling itself (books, materials, etc - both for parents and students), there's also the loss of income from at least one parent (when there even are two) not working. That can easily be half the household income gone, plus the expenses, and they still have to pay the taxes. And in a single parent household, what's the option? Live 100% on public assistance all the time?
You appear to be confusing "not be able" with "would not be a hardship."
That right there is the problem. If they had a choice, this would all be moot. Dumbasses who refuse to vaccinate their kids couple simply send them elsewhere with little or no cost. As it stands, if you're stupid enough to honestly believe vaccines will damage your child, your options come down to bending to the will of the state that you inject poison into your child or lose half/all of your household income and try to educate them yourself.
Again, you are advocating that it should be a reasonable option for parents to be unreasonable.
Look at all the anonymous cowards...
Was that what you said when you found that smoking was banned in elementary schools?
Doing something that you believe to be right that puts other human beings in serious risk is a burden that YOU must bear.
Do you think driving a school bus full of children while drunk is a freedom you need?
So, basically, there's very little reason to think that a parent refusing to vaccinate their child would not be able to home school them
Not much reason to allow unvaccinated (by choice) children into public schools then.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
