If they're using the app, yes, I should get paid, or they shouldn't be using the app.

Presumably because the arrangement of ones and zeros took hours of someone's life... they should really get paid for that. Aside from the lotto winners (angry birds, etc) the vast majority of developers make less than minimum wage off the apps. I have one that's sold close to a thousand copies and I'm still only at about $5.50/hour. So while stealing is clearly the wrong word (since you didn't deprive me of anything); copyright infringement applies and you should really feel pretty guilty -- particularly if you find my app useful.

Many I miss WebOS. But I gave up and just started using Android. It's not nearly as good, but it's better in the way italian is better than latin.

Actually, I think what the OP did was right. Assumed X and made conclusions from it. That's the only unambiguous way to name the fallacy imo. I'm saddened by the loss of begging the question, that's all.

Hey, this is logical fallacy is called "begging the question." The term you can't use anymore because everyone will think you mean "raising the question."

I wish this would go ahead and get popular, work, or be useful: http://tos-dr.info/

They said it was proprietary to get you off the phone -- they straight up don't know the answer and were tired of talking to you. You have no way to measure the transport overhead, but they're clearly counting it. Life goes on.

Seems like our IP laws are really helping our industries right now. Soon all data centers will be located out of the reach of *AA ?

Is your quote supposed to be something he said that was wrong (is that even a quote)? I think he got it right. The god written about in the old testament is a horrible person, and all those things are definitely aspects of the character as written; not that I think that's who modern Christians are worshiping -- they like a cloudier version made of Love or something.

So this is one of those spammers that buys hundreds of stupid domains just to get around all my blocking software? Honestly, I wish it was illegal for him to buy any more then. NOBODY wants that mail and if they signed up for it, THEY DIDN'T KNOW they did it.

I think the main reason to hack the kindles is to remove annoyances ... I buy a new kindle every year (yeah, I'm a sucker and I love the products) but I don't get my next one until I'm sure I can jailbreak it. Then I can add my own fonts, remove their ugly "screensavers" (exactly what am I saving btw? the display takes 0 power, just leave the fucking text there, thanks) and allow more formats (eg, epub). I buy a lot of books too, amazon isn't losing anything. Why don't they let me do these simple things out of the box? Idiots. No, wait, not idiots. If putting an mp3 in the usb drive can crack it... I think they know how to fix it and choose to not care. But this way, they not only have to not support it, but they don't even get the calls, "Hi, I cracked my kindle to use unsuported features; will you help me?"

There are also xss allow headers you can send in the http headers, called "http access control" and you can also get around it with things like JSONP.

It doesn't really have to be useful to do what you're describing. That's just gravy.

I'm under the impression that the current azw format is a mobi with hooks for the generation 1 kindles that do prc (palm III format) only. So your standard reader can read them, yes, by finding either the prc header or the mobi header. If it's encrypted, no so much, but yeah. it can read them.

... was document that he held the copyright or that he had permission to publish it.

This is standard procedure actually. You have to show that you hold the copyright or they won't publish it. I published a book for an author of a book that's been on the web for years. He (the author) had to fully document that he wrote it or they would have pulled the book -- despite the fact that we had a contract agreement that I was supposed to publish it. They insisted that only the copyright holder can publish under the model we had selected and they made him document it. That policy actually makes sense. There's like 6,000 copies of most public domain books, most of which are easier to read or better formatted for the web.