Comment Thanks for learning to live your faith (Score 1) 1027
Thank you David.
I rarely log in, but I needed to comment on this post (the OP).
Thank you David.
I rarely log in, but I needed to comment on this post (the OP).
One word: btrfs
All the posts here mostly talk about the wonders of zfs. I was enamored of zfs myself when it first came out.
Thing is, even if they got rid of the license problems, the thing is still not very linux kernel-friendly. The way it is, it will only ever exist in user-land/fuse. Yes, it can be made to work. So what?
Btrfs is better, uses zfs ideas and leaverages the linux kernel natively.
http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
But that's the job. You control what you can and try to mitigate what you can't.
Amen brother. Amen.
AC troll, yes. But to write that number of words on it means you are a seriously sick, twisted individual. Wow. The detail.
Even for
It takes a lot for me to log in and post but holy hannah you are one sick puppy, even for a troll.
Well, I could only one up you by a couple of years on using a computer to program something. Yes, that is what I do for a living, no, nothing you've ever heard of
But the real topic is the legal remedies that could be availed of and are not. I see your idea about patches being applied over existing law, but the analogy fails for common law I think. Law does change and gets amended, as you point out, but in common law some laws can always trump others. IANAL tho.
There really will always be bickering. Lets have laws that stop the obvious trolls in their tracks to the point that the really weak challenges don't even get to step one.
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.