Comment Re:Should we? (Score 1) 267
The only safe ship is the one that never leaves harbor...
Not even these.
The only safe ship is the one that never leaves harbor...
Not even these.
Now we can rest assured that our extinction will happen by the continuous burning of fossil fuels, not by the lack of it!
No it's not (although good on that kid!)
Yes, it is.
The only thing self defense will produce is an arms race... Next day kid A brings a club to get closely acquainted with the face of kid B, kid B brings a club with nails, then kid A brings a rusty metal rod etc... until something real bad happens...
The escalade of violence it's something that can happen, yes. Mainly, in no law lands, where there's no authority to settle things down.
What you fails to recognize is that bullying is about opportunity and unaccountability. Bullies do what they do because they can do it unchecked. The system FAILED to prevent the escalade of violence done by bullies.
It's not about self defense. It's about teaching (educating) people that this kind of stuff is wrong.
Some people never learns. You have to force them to behave. Granted, they have rights by them own, so we can't just kill them, lock them, or anything nasty and gross like that.
You must be American thinking everything can be solved by violence (as long as you have the upper hand of course)... it's really not and I hope you don't procreate!
No. I'm a brazilian already fed up of people that thinks like you playing havoc with our public safety policies. BE ADVISED, THIS VIDEO SHOWS REALLY STRONG CONTENTS (blood and murderer)- WATCH IT UNDER DISCRETION.
And, unfortunately for us, all these killers and bullies already procreated.
(just like me - live with that)
it appears to be a very predatory way of doing business on my eyes.
I remember an article I read on the late 80's or early 90's about how some small companies of that era feared growing too fast and ended up catching the attention of Microsoft, that at that time was buying everything and everybody (prices are pretty lower at that times). Building something cool that Microsoft would need was the fastest way of going out ot business.
I'd like to see this system implemented in The States. It basically circumvents the school yard bully from stealing lunch money from would-be victims.
The only thing that can (and will) circumvent the school yard bullies from bullying is this.
Self-defence is, always, the best defense.
Oh, the victim overreacted? Educate him/her , punishing him/her for force abuse if it's the case. BUT NEVER punish the self-defense.
They do have a large interest in the matter. If SHA-1 is broken and they keep selling it they lower the belief in the system. Thus it would lower the monetary value of ALL certificates.
How to lower the belief in something that no one's knows it there?
Common people don't know about cryptography and security. All that common people knows is about WHO tells that something is secure or not - if they trust the guy that says that something is secure, then they acts as it is secure.
Google is betting that people thrust Chrome.
Simple. The owner of the car will get the ticket.
Interesting. A very nice and new way to get "pwned" by someone.
"But sir, my car got hacked!!!"
If I get drunk, and my Google car drives me home and overrun a red light or something like that. Who the cops should blame? Who will get the ticket?
Dear Gothmolly,
Thanks for your insightful comments. Although Red Hat, Inc. is actually a $billion+ dollar multi-national corporation, management and the legions of technical staff we employ (totalling thousands of hours of combined expertise in a multitude of fields) had actually forgotten what we are, and the opinion of some fuckwith on Slashdot is exactly what we needed to get ourselves back on track.
Sincerest thanks,
Red Hat, Inc.
Say that to Microsoft and its Metro interface.
I'm responsible for a bunch of servers now.
One of them has a uptime of 660 days. Other, 120 or about it. My server with the lower uptime has 35 days - it has 37 days of life, by the way.
I'm not slightly interested on the booting speed of these machines - my main concern is the speed of the diagnostic procedures I need to carry on when something goes wrong.
God saves the runlevel 1.
GP was saying he wanted the choice to be made by a large committee. You are just saying you disagree with the large committee that made the choice.
What's not necessarily a bad thing, as History tells us.
The question is what was wrong with OpenRC?
It's flexible enough to do just about all the useful tasks that sysV and that systemd does.
We really don't want a kernel in user space unless you want Linux to become infected with the finder syndrome of MacOSX.
That's the problem: it's too damn flexible, it's too damn practical, it's too damn EASY to maintain. How in hell a big enterprise will be able to profit on such environment?
Corporations need hard to maintain, almost impossible to learn systems deployd on their customer's machines in order to keep them under their grasp.
It's what is happening with systemd? I don't know. But I know the past, and this is the path that Microsoft, Oracle et all choose to follow - and this was not by accident.
No, no. systemd doesn't make mistakes.
The system ends up booting by a series of well placed accidents.
DMS => DMG
(sorry the typo)
I wrote a tool back in the day that would boot anybody off any Quake 1 server (except CMU guys off CMU servers - they actually knew how to protect their networks). It was great!
So it was you? Bastard!
Jokes aside, we setup our own server - you would have to portscan half the Internet in order to find our server to DDoS us.
Setting your own game server is Quake 1's most missed feature to me, the rocket jump being the second!
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"
