WITHOUT RECOMPILING THE WORLD? =P

When I have a tool set of standalone applications, each one consuming the production of the other, it's easy to replace a single component (or recompiling a single component) without having to re-homologate everything.

But this is a Quality Team problem, and we are all developers, right? Fsck the Quality, right?

Allow me to rephrase my question to something less abstract: I want to get rid of DBUS. Can I do it?

If by politics you mean "being or not cavalier about solving problems", HELL YES.

I don't care about who you vote. I don't care about what you believe.

I care about HOW YOU BEHAVE when you face a problem you created yourself (or are responsible for).

Being cavalier about your responsibilities is a important fact for me if I need to use your code.

I don't care if you call it politics or not.

WITHOUT RECOMPILING THE WORLD? =P

When I have a tool set of standalone applications, each one consuming the production of the other, it's easy to replace a single component (or recompiling a single component) without having to re-homologate everything.

But this is a Quality Team problem, and we are all developers, right? Fsck the Quality, right?

Allow me to rephrase my question to something less abstract: I want to get rid of DBUS. Can I do it?

So we should all not use politics, except if they fit into your agenda?

If by politics you mean "being or not cavalier about solving problems", HELL YES.

I don't care about who you vote. I don't care about what you believes.

I care about HOW YOU BEHAVE when you face a problem you created yourself (or are responsible for).

Being cavalier about your responsibilities is a important fact for me if I need to use your code.

I don't care if you call it politics or not.

Windows 8 OEM Service Release 2. :-)

However, KDE isn't maintained by normal people.

There's no single free software entity, nowadays, that can handle EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of an Operating System alone.

Desktops are hard enough.

Good. Can I replace any one of these so binaries, so I can get rid of a nasty security flaw?

If these people are writing the code, HELL YES!

Yes. For 15 minutes, until I googled for articles explaining why systemd was a good idea, and had a hard time finding a convincing one.

Seriously, if you want to know if a new EFI system will be better to your pimped new car, you should ask people that earns their money by using it (racers), not car sellers or street users.

The SWAT teams *are* paid hitmen : they hit bad guys and get paid for it. :-)

Redirection.

This attack, no matter who did, it's an excellent material to be used against whatever USA needs at the moment.

Once all (or most all) the work is being made by robots, who will receive salaries, that then will be spent on the goodies the robots are producing?

You see, you need CONSUMERS to earn money from them. And the government, TAXPAYERS - by the way.

Or they plan to "fix" this little problem by paying salaries to robots, giving them vacations, etc? =P

Yep. Incredible, uh? =P

I prefer "shitware". :-)

please mod parent up.

Doubling the computing power needed to do something that I already had?

Increasing the risk of failure without adding nothing of value?

And yet, you got +1 Insightful points?

I worked on company that used CollabNet. It was pretty good for large projects.

GutHub is too "code warrior" for my taste. I would bet my coins on BitBucket.

I understood that the problem is the company not willing to do support anymore - ergo, they're not expending any resources on gathering developers to help. You see, you need expend employee's time in order to look for help out there: you can not find what you don't look for.

And, if you don't know, Source Force is not a web site hosting service. It's a full blown software development infrastructure. Code repository, communication, releasing, bug tracking, support.