I thought we'd have flying cars before we'd lose the chance to drive.

All kidding aside, 40 years from now we'll still be driving our own cars because programmers won't be able to help a car decide if it is allowed to avoid a collision that will kill a driver by swerving onto a sidewalk and killing two pedestrians.

Yes, that's true, but it was the first successful attack.

Cept the germans used it in ypres, Belgium - so they should of stayed the fuck out of Belgium and gassed themselves?

At least you're bringing a gun to a gun fight - but remember, he's got the edge, you're too busy with the smartphone. By the time you drop it and reach he can shoot in self defense.

I think a better option would be to not collide with him in the first place. That way you won't get shot.

What good are robots if no one has a job earning money to buy the products made by the robots?

I guess it's to save a few minutes from having to call up a few carriers and ask for the dumps?

I think that all videos and events should be presented without editing or commentary.

I would prefer to mike my mind up instead of having others decide "what I need to know" .

I have to wear glasses and would rather not, gas perms and other contacts that I've tried suck - so why would anyone need to wear glasses when they don't need to, or invest in a pair that still has to be upgraded to prescription lenses?

This whole "glass" thing reminds of ten years ago when the rage was three d gaming in Unreal Tournament - a thing of the future (just like flying cars for everyone).

That should make the lives of anyone planning the math launches for missions quite a bit more interesting.

Personally, I hate Satellite Internet - after suffering under a fair use policy and having my bandwidth reduce to 1.2 k under Hughes, I don't see how even having 2400 small satellites in orbit can help, or envision the lag time if they made it work with a large population.

As long as they use it while driving to text - It'll be a spectacular dump of chlorine in the gene pool as they kill themselves off.

I take it you've never worked in a corporation.

You have good intentions that should be written into fortune cookies, but I think you sadly lack in working in the real world.

I read this thread and being new to having a smartphone that I can't root since I bought it for my business and need it to charge credit cards and started panicking.

So I read thru all the op and then found in the s4 what version I was running, and I am at 4.4.4 so I'm good to go.

For people not good to go - take the articles, and start calling and screaming at the providers that have you under contract and make them ship you a new phone. That was my plan if I wasn't covered.

Do you own a cell phone? A pc? A television? A vehicle?

You could of kept one starving family in costa rica happy had you just sent your cash to them instead of buying all that stuff.

How many times has this administration embraced a petition and moved forward with it?

if a poor person sues apple, then the proportioned 50/50 will have apple paying for the plaintiffs defense. The more cash apple throws at the fight, the more they will have to give to the plaintiff for the plaintiff's defense.

If Apple is in the right, then they win, and the poor defendant is on hook for the entire bill.

This insures that the rich megacorps only fight when they really have the high ground. This would also eliminate harassment lawsuits since if you are just being a dick, you're going to lose everything.