Citation needed

From the article:

I tried to tune out the boys’ sexual comments.

This whole thing is just an example to illustrate the problem of girls getting a hard time in class, so while discussions about the place of nudity in society may be interesting they have little or nothing to do with TFA.

It can be expected, but it still doesn't make it justified or acceptable

I wrote as much way above in my first post did I not? It's indefensible.

They did just that.

Muslims and Arabs and Africans are free to practice their unique ways in their own countries. There is simply no reason for those people to be in Europe

Consider those words and then consider the vast majority of migrants to the colonies in America. The entire place was based on being able to run things differently to the way the Catholic and English churches wanted people to run their lives.

It's all fun and games until their trolling incites someone to successfully blow up some innocent kids that have been dragged along by their idiot parents. Even if it's just the idiot parents that get blown up it's a stupidly high price for the sake of stirring up a bit of hate for fun.
At best they are fanning the flames and turning people who wouldn't consider joining extremists into being extremists.

Saying that doesn't make it true, and it isn't

So I'm lying terrorist scum now am I?

By saying that they shouldn't have done what they did, you are blaming the victim.

How simplisticly stupid. See basic road safety for kids if you want to see how easily your accusation breaks down.

To avoid posts like yours I put the following on my first post as a sort of intelligence test:

I am in no way defending either the loud xenophobic fascist Wilders or anyone that wants to take a shot at him.

Guess how you did in the test? I don't know whether it's attention span that let you down, but for some reason you've been arguing with a strawman all this time despite the obvious signpost above.

Recalibrate. I'm sure you're not a stupid or bad person... just, recalibrate.

Rather arrogant, especially when you didn't even pay attention to what my view on the topic is!

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I'm just not on board with the idea of protecting workers when that causes a lot of long term harm to societies.

Next time you see your great-granddad, ask him what he thinks about interracial marriages.

(That is basically the level of your argument, in case this isn't readily obvious.)

Maori didn't quite conquer New Zealand that way (there was no-one to conquer it from), but they definitely did assemble a fleet large enough to be an invasion force.

Care to cite the relevant part?

Golden Dawn is by all accounts a neo-Nazi party (heck, all it takes is a single look at their official flag to confirm that). It's amusing when neo-Nazis refer to themselves as liberals, but don't expect anyone to be fooled.

interesting

sounds like it could also lead to groundbreaking new science along the lines of "hey, that's odd..." discoveries in the past where results were wildly outside expectations

why are you amazed and dismayed at people reacting to a threat?

why aren't you amazed and dismayed at the loser douchebag making the threat?

who needs to threaten people except a malicious person or a stupid and violent person?

most of it is empty, yes, until one asshole delivers. so you have to take it seriously as no one socially normal or well-intentioned makes violent threats

it is MEANT to cause fear

that's the actual problem genius!

that's how freedom is curtailed: by making you question your safety where you should feel secure

franklin's quote is ridiculously overused because security of course is a necessary thing in this world. it of course can go to far, but what amazes me are internet tough guys who think all prudent responsible reaction to threats is hysterical overreaction. these same internet tough guys will be going "the police heard the threats, why didn't they do anything!" because such losers don't argue form the position of right or wrong or logical coherence, just empty criticism without any intelligence or integrity