Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Woman Creates 3-D Erotic Book For the Blind Screenshot-sm 113

Lisa J. Murphy has written an erotic book with tactile images for that special visually impaired porn connoisseur in your life. Tactile Mind contains explicit softcore raised images, along with Braille text and photos. From the article: "A photographer with a certificate in Tactile Graphics from the Canadian National Institute for the Blind, Murphy learned to create touchable images of animals for books for visually impaired children. Then she realized that there was a lack of such books for adults only. 'There are no books of tactile pictures of nudes for adults, at least the last time I looked around,' says Murphy. 'We're breaking new ground. Playboy has [an edition with] Braille wording, but there are no pictures.' She says that while we live in a culture saturated with sexual images, the blind have been 'left out.'"

Comment Re:The Constitution (Score 5, Insightful) 260

The sheer amount of 5-4 decisions on the court should indicate that the court makes political decisions, and not merely informed, unbiased interpretations of law.

Not really. It just suggests that cases where the law is clear (and thus would have larger majorities) don't tend to make it to the Supreme Court.

Comment Re:Oh give me a BREAK! (Score 1) 981

I think I may not have been clear in my meaning. I didn't mean that deaf people are in some kind of gang or think they're better than anyone else.

What I meant was that a disability such as deafness can have a profound impact on someone's life and can become part of someone's internal identity. Being deaf is part of what makes them who they are. As previously stated I think that defining yourself this way is as silly as letting other people define you that way, but that doesn't change the fact that people do it.

When you start talking about curing things that define a person, especially things which a person uses to define themselves, you start treading into a certain amount of ethical gray area.

In changing that identifying feature, you change the person, you in a sense eliminate the person who was and replace them with an entirely new individual. A rather vocal portion of people with certain kinds of disabilities seem to hold this view. I don't particularly agree with it, but it's the core of a lot of these "ethical questions" and "normalizing the population" arguments.

My overall point was that colour blindness doesn't seem to be of sufficient impact on peoples lives that they define themselves internally with respect to it and so there's likely very few ethical problems with it and mostly of the "slippery slope" variety.

Comment Re:I don't think IPv6 is really the future any mor (Score 1) 438

Well if you want to be cheap, just go for the 7200. With those platforms you're paying for the hardware forwarding, not for the ability to route the full Internet. Ok, the RSP720CXL is marginally more expensive than the RSP720C, but that really is in the noise. (And the ASR-1000 is technically a software router, it's just damn fast.)

Comment How WARF Works. (Score 4, Informative) 79

I was a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin for 6 years, during which I was able to work with Guri Sohi as his teaching assistant, in addition to having many stimulating technical discussions.

WARF (Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, warf.org) helps faculty and students patent their ideas and protect the patents. Remember, a patent is only as good as the lawyers who are willing to go to court to defend it--as this WARF v. Intel situation has shown.

WARF was established in 1925, and helped the University of Wisconsin become one of the first academic institutions to take advantage of the patent system. The patent for including vitamin D in milk was the first big money winner for WARF and the university.

The system is driven by the inventor. If a faculty member or student has an idea they want to patent, WARF covers the expenses, provides help with prior-art, etc. efforts, and pledges to defend the patent. For this, WARF gets 80% of the patent revenues, which it puts back into research funding for the university. The inventor(s) receive 20% of the revenues. From what I have heard, this is a larger percentage than that given to the inventor at many other institutions.

-Todd

Comment Re:Do audio versions cost more? (Score 1) 683

Um, what? You can be sure that the blind are not a substantial portion of the sales of audiobooks. Many, many people use them to listen to books during their commute to and from work. Fact is, an audiobook is more expensive to produce: it's a superset of the creative effort that goes into writing a book. In most cases voice talent must be hired (and compensated) and, even if it's the author reading the book, studio space must be used and many hours of work must be spent reading per hour of finished work.

Comment Re:Pepsi (Score 1) 243

A trademark of what? Godzilla is a fabricated mythical creature. It isn't a product. It doesn't endorse products. They have made some products based on Godzilla, but The Godzilla is as trademarkable as Grendel.

More like, as trademarkable as Mickey Mouse. Read the link. It discusses the fact that Disney characters are trademarked as well as copyrighted.

Slashdot Top Deals

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...