I first heard about the electron migration problem as a reason for not overclocking back in the 386 days.
And yet my Celeron 300A has been running stable (first under OS/2, then XP) at 450Mhz since I bought it, 10 years ago.
Record uptime was ~650 days under XP, before a disk failure got it. And that disk was essentially "DOA" (visible bad sectors) but rather than RMA it I decided to see how long it lasted (obviously it's not a very important box).
PowerMax and NTFS/chkdsk recovered the initial damage and marked about 400k worth of visible bad sectors. It then survived another 4 years before SMART started reporting errors again, and it took another 6 months before it finally actually crashed.
SeaTools reset 102 problem sectors, NTFS/chkdsk reports no new visible bad sectors and recovered minor inconsistencies due to the crash. System is back online once again.
So it would seem modern tech is a little more resilient than we give it credit for, especially if the software doesn't shit itself as a result (this experiment would have failed miserably on ReiserFS).
</anecdote>
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
(George Bernard Shaw)
Why would anyone but a bussiness person want a netbook?
Anyone with ubiquitous network access? They're called netbooks for a reason.
I have plenty of storage and processing power elsewhere, I don't need battery sucking features on my portable terminal.
Netbook == PADD with a keyboard.
The only time I would feel an obligation of support is if I've had to put up with endless whining about the superiority of open source and how there's no possible reason I could want closed source software, until I caved.
Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach