Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Blur (Score 1) 215

A lot of the changes that people claim are "downgrades" are just aesthetic choices. The modded version is darker overall and colors are less vibrant. The mod increases the reflectiveness of wet surfaces (which I think makes it look way less realistic to the point that it looks goofy). As you mentioned, the DoF effect looks terrible and makes the game unplayable. The only real "upgrades" are basically the car headlights and rain particles. Everything else is basically an aesthetic choice.

Also the claims that there are no performance hits is a lie. Every video I've seen comparing the two, there is a noticeable (but minor) drop in framerate with the mod. Some people are claiming that the mod gets rid of "stuttering", but I haven't seen any hard (meaning video) evidence of that.

Comment Re:Yup-article is BS (Score 2) 394

Technically, nowhere in the article did it say they consumed 500W. It said they were *rated* for 500W, which means the hardware within is capable of handling a 500W charge. I agree that even mentioning it in the article is just an attention grabbing tactic, but the point of that line is that the architect saw the very high rating which led them to investigate the actual usage, which turned out to be 35W (which is still high for something many people leave on 24/7 and are increasingly having multiple of in their home).

Comment A pretty low requirement (Score 3, Insightful) 432

I feel like the requirements for the Turing test have been consistently lowered over the years to match what would be considered realistic to achieve rather than, as Alan Turing seemed to believe, demonstrate that a computer can be said to actually be "thinking."

Comment Re:UPS (Score 1) 521

The average user doesn't know not to click pop-up ads for fake antivirus. That's why so many people feel comfortable with an "app store" experience like that of iOS or the game consoles, because it protects the average user from himself.

It's not relevant that those users are ignorant or don't make any effort to protect themselves. They're still users and they still deserve a positive user experience. Autosave helps them have that positive user experience. Antiviruses help them have that positive user experience. Windows features that help protect them from themselves (but annoy the hell out of informed power users) help them have that positive user experience. Using software should be as easy as using a microwave or driving a car. People don't have to know how those machines work, mechanically or theoretically, or how to fix them, in order to have positive user experiences with them and use them as tools to accomplish their goals. Software should be the same way.

Comment Re:UPS (Score 1) 521

Do you honestly believe the average user has a UPS? Or that they never try to use their laptop away from an outlet at very low battery life? These kinds of assumptions are what make for bad user experiences.

Comment Re:I'd rather not use (Score 1) 521

Perhaps you've heard of a thing called a power outage. I just had one last night. Or maybe you've had a cat step on your keyboard and somehow manage to close the window you were working in. There are enough acts of god and human error that still exist regardless of how flawless the program you're working in is to make autosave highly valuable. The 1000 times you don't need autosave are not nearly as critical as the 1 time you do.

Slashdot Top Deals

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...