Comment Re:Dang... (Score 1) 139
For the TL;DR crowd - Go read some Paul Tillich
For the TL;DR crowd - Go read some Paul Tillich
What we need is FireFox OS on the desktop.
Hate Mozilla all you want, this is exactly the reason we need them around.
A lesson about infinity from a guy who fails at basic geometry... I think I'll skip this one.
as much fun to code in as Python
Wow, that's almost as fun as a trip to the dentist!
Funny.
Unfortunately, unlike the surgeon, the added complexity developers suffer from does not offer any actual benefits -- and may even be harmful.
It's all there in the summary.
Women wants to be treated like a woman - and still be equal to men
How dare they demand equality!
It's a matter of perspective. For some people, money is the last factor considered.
It is the nature of science that it is never settled. It wouldn't work otherwise.
Consequently, the silly little catch-phrase "the science is settled" is a very anti-scientific statement.
The science cheerleaders would do well to learn a little basic science before going around lamenting the scientific illiteracy of others.
That would be ridiculous.
It was the unholy power they gained after their subsequent introduction to the occult. Their success is most likely to do Satanic influence.
Have seen the movie Key Largo?
I bet you 2, 3 years, we get prohibition back. This time we make it stick. Bet you 2, 3 years prohibition comes back. Absolutely, yeah The trouble was, see, before, too many guys wanted to be top dog. One mob gets to massacring another, the papers play it up big, see, so what happens? Naturally, the papers play it up big, and the public get the idea prohibition’s no good, and if they can get rid of it, prohibition, I mean
So you agree while disagreeing strongly!
That's fun.
At one point it was "proven" that it is impossible to produce the equivalent of a NOR gate with neurons.
You've got it wrong. Single-layer ANN's are not Turing complete. This is well established.
You might be thinking of the XOR problem, but that was solved ages ago thanks to backpropagation. Though there was no proof that it was "impossible".
Either way, you've got your history wrong.
Maybe. We'll know that we're successful if they run away from you, screaming.
There is also no reason to believe it is true. "Intelligence" is a mostly meaningless word. There is no consensus definition, and no testable or falsifiable phenomenon associated with it.
Even worse, he never actually said that!
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.
