STILL no evidence for your claims!
Instead, I get a bunch of porn and a conspiracy theory. Oh, you have no evidence because Reddit is hiding the truth! Does the NSA come in to play here? How about Area 51?
Well, I'm not surprised at all. People like you delve in to fantasy when reality doesn't suit your crazy beliefs.
Why do you want to put so much responsibility on the victims?
Are you a criminal?
Then when is the appropriate time to raise it?
Did you miss it? He said:
But the time for that is before the crime
You even quoted it.
Giving a bribe makes makes you just as guilty whether you offered one or the other party requested one.
I'm thinking more coercion than bribery. Hence, "power dynamics".
"That's a nice game you've got there, it would be a shame if I had to give it a shitty review..."
How sad you must be to not know that anything with
Sad? I'd say the exact opposite of that. Moving on...
"The Fappening" refers to a series of nude photographs featuring various high profile celebrities leaked on 4chan in late August of 2014.
You have absolutely no evidence, so you direct me to a porn site? Are you 12? Why not just link to goatse?
Pathetic.
Well, I try again: I said the behavior of the "+" operator in Javascript is non-deterministic because you have no way to guarantee the type of the variables involved
Nice change. (You never said that! At least you're trying to learn from your mistakes.) Of course, all it does is make you look like an idiot. 1) because you don't know what the term "non-deterministic" means 2) because variables in JS don't have types, values do.
Let me guess: You're an autodidact?
(and therefore the hack to ensure that what should be a string remains a string so that the operation using the "+" return the expected result for a string).
This has been driving me crazy. Since when is an explicit cast an "ugly hack"? How long have you been programming, half an hour?
So you rescind your claims that "the language behaves in a non-deterministic way" and "there is no way to say with certainty what the interpreter will do since there's no telling for sure if he will treat the "+" operator as a sum of integers or a concatenation of strings"?
That's what this whole thing was about, after all. If you're willing to accept that those nonsense claims are total nonsense, then we're in complete agreement.
If you're not, then you're 100% wrong when you claim to "know how the '+' operator works".
I wonder, as you double-down on your lunacy:
The ugly hack I mentioned earlier just makes sure that a given string variable will be interpreted as a string when I need it to be a string"
You wouldn't need your "ugly hack" if you knew how the + operator worked, after all.
No, you didn't. You still don't know how the + operator works. You just came up with a convoluted way to avoid learning how it works.
If you had actually learned how the + operator works, you wouldn't say ridiculous things like "random" or "there is no way to say with certainty what the interpreter will do".
Perhaps you shouldn't post about things you know nothing about. If nothing else, when someone points out how ridiculous you sound, you read the docs to make sure that you're not continuing to spread nonsense.
No, you did not.
/r/thefappening
Is not a source. What's the domain?
Further: Why the hell would I go to any URL with a reference to masturbation? It looks like a sad joke.
If you were better at interpreting text and had dealt more with the case described, you would have understood what I mean by random is that there is no way to say with certainty what the interpreter will do since there's no telling for sure if he will treat the "+" operator as a sum of integers or a concatenation of strings.
It's like I'm talking to a wall.
There IS a "way to say with certainty what the interpreter will do". You just haven't taken the few minutes required to find out how!
It's happened to me more than once
Then you're either ridiculously lazy or a complete moron. You'll find that if you actually learn the language before you use it, you won't struggle with simple things.
Again, it's not the language's fault that you're unwilling or unable to learn how it works!
True.
The language behaves in a non-deterministic way and this is my fault?
The language does NOT behave in a non-deterministic way. That you believe it does IS your fault.
Yeah, it's not language's fault that you didn't bother to learn it.
It has types, and you really don't need classes. Prototypes are better in just about every way.
Randomly?
Look like you don't understand the basics of how the language works.
You can't blame that language for your gross incompetence.
So, you think js sucks because, if you're a total moron, you'll do dumb things?
Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky
