Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - AP Shows 8 Ways Obama's "Most Transparent Administration Ever" Blocks Informatio

schwit1 writes: We have put in place the toughest ethics and transparency laws of any administration in history," President Obama proclaimed four short years ago... However, as AP Washington Bureau Chief Sally Buzbee said recently, the fight for access to public information has never been harder, and in fact, the problem extends across the entire federal government and is now trickling down to state and local governments. Here is Buzbee’s list of eight ways Obama's "most transparent" administration is making it hard for journalists to find information and cover the news...

Though, it seems, as AP reports, that is simply not true...

1) As the United States ramps up its fight against Islamic militants, the public can’t see any of it. News organizations can’t shoot photos or video of bombers as they take off — there are no embeds. In fact, the administration won’t even say what country the S. bombers fly from.

2) The White House once fought to get cameramen, photographers and reporters into meetings the president had with foreign leaders overseas. That access has become much rarer. Think about the message that sends other nations about how the world’s leading democracy deals with the media: Keep them out and let them use handout photos.

3) Guantanamo: The big important 9/11 trial is finally coming up. But we aren’t allowed to see most court filings in real time — even of nonclassified material. So at hearings, we can’t follow what’s happening. We don’t know what prosecutors are asking for, or what defense attorneys are arguing.

4) Information about Guantanamo that was routinely released under President George W. Bush is now kept secret. The military won’t release the number of prisoners on hunger strike or the number of assaults on guards. Photo and video coverage is virtually nonexistent.

5) Day-to-day intimidation of sources is chilling. AP’s transportation reporter’s sources say that if they are caught talking to her, they will be fired. Even if they just give her facts, about safety, for example. Government press officials say their orders are to squelch anything controversial or that makes the administration look bad.

6) One of the media — and public’s — most important legal tools, the Freedom of Information Act, is under siege. Requests for information under FOIA have become slow and expensive. Many federal agencies simply don’t respond at all in a timely manner, forcing news organizations to sue each time to force action.

7) The administration uses FOIAs as a tip service to uncover what news organizations are pursuing. Requests are now routinely forwarded to political appointees. At the agency that oversees the new health care law, for example, political appointees now handle the FOIA requests.

8) The administration is trying to control the information that state and local officials can give out. The FBI has directed local police not to disclose details about surveillance technology the police departments use to sweep up cellphone data. In some cases, federal officials have formally intervened in state open records cases, arguing for secrecy.

Comment Re:gender-based funding (Score 1) 88

It's called reverse discrimination, and it's wrong.

Doing so in education teaches by action (and thus re-affirms) that somehow women can't compete. And yet, the majority of people graduating degree programs are women.

You can't reduce gender bias by introducing even more gender bias. And since we're talking about education, what better place to practice / teach non-bias?

Submission + - Apple 'Wave' Prank Tricks User Into Microwaving Their iPhone 6 (latesttoptechnews.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A fake infographic ad is going round on Social media telling iPhone owners that they can quickly juice up their phones in the microwave once they upgrade to iOS 8. According to the Pranksters, iOS 8 comes with new drivers that interfaced with your iPhone 6 radio-based band allowing it to synchronize with microwave frequencies and use them to quickly recharge your battery. Of course common sense should tell that this is not true--But some people still fell for it

Submission + - From PHP 5 to 7 (halls-of-valhalla.org)

halls-of-valhalla writes: Since around 2005 we've heard talk about PHP 6 development. There have even been books sold about it. But where is PHP 6? As of July of this year it was decided that there won't be one and that PHP will skip directly to PHP 7. Why is it skipping to the next major version, and what ever happened with PHP 6?

In 2005, work began on a project headed by Andrei Zmievski to bring native Unicode support to PHP by embedding the International Components for Unicode (ICU) library and internally representing strings as UTF-16. Because this project would lead to major internal and user-affecting changes, it was planned to be the next major PHP version (i.e. PHP 6) along with a few other features.

By using UTF-16 as default encoding, developers would need to convert the code and all input (e.g. data from requests, database, etc.) from one encoding to UTF-16 and back again. This conversion takes a lot of CPU time, memory (to store the much larger strings), and creates a higher complexity in the implementation due to the increased need to detect the proper encoding for the situation. In light of all of this and the relatively small gain, many contributors became unwilling to use "trunk" as their main development branch and instead either using the stable 5.2/5.3 branches or refusing to do development at all. This shortage of developers led to delays in the project.

After a vote in July of 2014, it was officially decided that the next major release would be called PHP 7. The primary reason for even considering the name is the widely-known existence of the previous failed attempt of a new major release, and the existence of numerous books and other resources which already referred to the previous PHP 6. To address potential confusion, there was an RFC (i.e. request for comments) and a vote on whether or not to reuse this name.

In the end it was decided to release PHP 7 as the next major version, arguing that the worst case scenario is that they needlessly skipped a version as opposed to the worst case of releasing it as PHP 6 which is widespread confusion in the community.

Read the full story here: Valhalla News — From PHP 5 to 7

Comment Re:Ok Barb: HOW am I "absurd"? (Score 1) 460

Well, since you FINALLY asked how you are absurd:

1st definition of absurd from google: Ab-surd: (of a person or a person's behavior or actions) foolish; unreasonable.

Going through every post I make in every thread, posting multiple responses (up to 100 posts a day) attacking me based on my gender (including in a thread about sexual harassment) - I think that most people would qualify your behaviour as both foolish and unreasonable.

Getting all bent out of shape when someone exposes your bullying tactics and then tells other people how to do the same to you - both your original bullying and your response when you get it thrown right back at you are foolish, unreasonable, and just plain childish.

Saying I'm stalking you when it's obvious you're the one doing the stalking - foolish, unreasonable, and more than a bit delusional. Oh, and your paranoia is showing.

Thinking that attacking me because I'm transsexual is going to get you anywhere on a tech site, when tech attracts a higher-than-average number of people in the LGBT community, as well as sympathizers, is foolish. Continuing it day after day when it doesn't work is not just unreasonable, it's stupid and/or insane.

Clinging to arguments for your HOSTS file that are completely orthogonal to today's reality, and that obviously the vast majority don't care about and don't need because they have found better ways to solve their own problems, is foolish on it's face and unreasonable to those looking on, who use their computers just fine without your "solution."

Going on about how "taking estrogen is rotting your brain", that "you're crazy to have cut your balls off" (btw - I'm not a surgeon, and I don't pretend to be one on the innnertubes), when I'm following expert medical advice that has a proven track record of success, well, that's both foolish and ridiculous.

The problem isn't your hosts file - it's your behaviour, which certainly is absurd, and probably disturbed as well.

That leads to another question - why? What is it about me in particular that sets you off worse than anyone else? Is it me, or do you have a problem with women in general (I seem to recall some attacks you made on other women who have challenged you that would indicate that this may be the case)? Do you think that men are superior to women, and that anyone who willingly "trades in" to become a woman is stupid because you have a low opinion of women?

And that, of course, brings us back on-topic - the "science has a sexual assault problem. You don't seem to be capable of the introspection necessary to realize how absurd your behaviour is. How many other women have you felt it's your right to attack, and still continue years later, about their sex, gender, or sexual identity, just because you disagreed with their opinion on a technical issue of absolutely no import to anyone but you?

Comment Obvious solution ... (Score 2) 138

"Send in the drones!" Why not fight drones with drones? Cheaper than a stupid "drone shield" that sends you a text, probably without enough time to do anything.

Throw in a few old-tech barrage balloons (even weather balloons will do) trailing netting (even helicopters will avoid that), some really high-powered water and potato cannons, and the odd trebuchet filled with flaming dung or politicians (same diff), and "The Making of Star Wars Episode VII" becomes more than just filler.

Comment Re:Ok Barb: HOW am I "absurd"? (Score 1) 460

You seem to forget that I once worked for the Russians. They taught me a few things, I taught them a few things, fun times.

It's entirely possible to create malware that doesn't use DNS, and it doesn't matter how many entries you put in your hosts file, you're screwed. We investigated this because we had to be ready if someone tried to do this to us, because they could have poisoned a LOT of computers that way. And, of course, because it's always handy to have something special in your bag of tricks :-)

Like I said, it's absurd not to take advantage of the capabilities of modern hardware. Because if you don't some $BAD_PERSON out there will be quite happy to steal all those cpu cycles you "saved."

Your "15 questions" are straw men that take away from the point that you're obsolete, and so is your hosts file "solution", which is why you have a long reputation of being the "hosts file troll".

Comment Re:If this works, then Microsoft is doomed. (Score 2) 101

Come on, Android can change the layout of widgets, as well as the logic behind them, on everything from phones to HD TVs.

Just grab the "settings" app and see the difference in layout between a phone and a tablet. On the phone, selecting an item brings up an overlay screen of options for that selection. On a tablet, the selection list is displayed on the left, the options on the right.

You can make arbitrarily complex layouts to accommodate different needs on different displays. Same as Windows.

Comment Re:Finally a universal binary standard (Score 1) 101

It was, but Sun fragmented Java ME (Micro Edition) so they could get millions in licensing fees from all the different variants of the runtime engine since they were pretty closely tied to each phone's hardware for performance reasons.

It's not like today, when we have quad core phones with oodles of ram for under $200, and tablets breaking the $100 barrier, and we can afford to run a generic runtime.

Submission + - The Rise of Wagnerian Science [corr] (eloquentscience.com)

TheRealHocusLocus writes: Just encountered Negative Results are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries [2011] from master lexicographer Daniele Fanelli, whose 2009 work on scientific misconduct was covered on Slashdot. He finds "the proportion of papers that, having declared to have tested a hypothesis, reported a full or partial support has grown by more than 20% between 1990 and 2007." Does this mean that as a species, we are becoming better at guessing — or are there other forces at work?

One thing that jumped at me in Fanelli's paper [Fig 3, p7] was the smoothness of this progression for the US authors, as compared with other countries. Richard Feynman noted "The thing that doesn't fit is the thing that's most interesting." Are we seeking those things? Newton was almost right. Bereft of rigorous testing to invalidate popular hypotheses, would we be likely to notice "negative results" such as the disparities that led into quantum mechanics, today? Or would they be swept under the rug of selective funding and implied consensus?

Years ago when listening to The Ring I found myself switching the turntable to 78rpm to complete the Cycle in a few hours — its musical sentiment was soo obvious and I "see" where it was going. Science should embody more Contrapunctus, a fugue where negative and positive entwine in a thoughtful dance. Writing this summary I must endeavor not to relate this to climate science. Oops.

Comment Re:Must be an american thing ??? (Score 1) 65

My left eye was always more nearsighted than my right, so that's where the tear occurred. So while everything is severely distorted due to macular pucker, and I have a blind spot in the center, I am not going to complain. It's been 6 months and I don't see any real change in transparency, so maybe I'll get lucky for a change - though I doubt it. The surgeon did say it's 100% within 2 years.

The eyes had "a few more loops" - more blood vessels growing - at my last exam in May, but not enough to laser them again. Hopefully December will be more of the same.

Not even reading glasses? I'm impressed!

Comment Re:I told the truth (you're a tranny freak)... apk (Score 1) 460

You're such a fool, apk. Stuck in the mid-90s technologically, the '70s socially ... transsexual women have the same status in law as genetic women. And in society? We're where gays and lesbians were a generation ago - uber-cool to have at least one as a friend. Jealous much?

All I told people to do is what you've been doing to others for years. You can dish it out (sort of), but you can't take it, because you're a hypocrite, like most narcissists.

As for the "sockpuppet account" charge, you know it's bogus. When I was outed on slashdot in '06, I took a second account that was more gender-appropriate. And no, you didn't "chase me away" in 2012 - my retinas deteriorated to the point where I couldn't use a computer (or read, or sometimes even see). Contrary to expectations, and thanks to a lot of hard work by several teams of specialists, I can see well enough to use a computer, read, do day-to-day tasks (just don't ask me to drive a car, tell the difference between colours, ask me if a picture is straight, or similar stuff). If I still had the old passwords, I would have gone back to using my old accounts.

But keep on going through every post I make, and using proxies to post 100 times a day about how I'm such a weird freak. All you're doing is reinforcing your reputation as a social maladroit and a hater of people like me who put the "T" in LGBT.

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...