It will reduce concussions, but greatly increase more threatening problems.

The simplest and easiest solution is just to add rules that protect the head.

On the contrary it has everything to do with it.

The court can't compel you to do anything if it's free speech.

There is no right to not be offended.

Abram's Star Trek? Intellectual? Plot twists? ...

Uhhhhh....

That's an institutional problem, not a technological one.

Incompetent handling of nuclear power does not undermine its potential.

Breeder reactors create more fuel than they use. Further, techniques can be used to greatly decrease the amount of waste created.

The risks of a meltdown is zero with modern reactors, they have plenty of passive mechanisms in place.

I suppose you could sabotage a modern reactor, but the best you can do is blow up the whole plant and spread radiation everywhere. The reactor can't be forced to meltdown or anything of the sort.

Unfortunately no, they did the opposite of the safe thing and extended the life of old reactors and increased the output.

But just because they're being all twisted and stupid about it doesn't mean they have their head up their ass. They clearly see the benefit in investing in nuclear infrastructure. They have eight new reactors being built that are set to be completed all within the next two years. Probably plans for more on the way. It's a very aggressive strategy, and I'd imagine after the new ones are online the old ones are going to be decommissioned.

They're building one fast breeder reactor, the rest of the new ones are all VVER. It will likely pave the way for future breeder reactors.

And just as sustainable (if not more) than renewable energy.

So far the only country who doesn't seem to have their head up their ass in regards to nuclear policy is Russia (feel free to point me to other examples).

Doubly true, we recently stuck a worm's brain in a robot body.

Wowowowow and a worm is way more complicated than an amoeba! Dr. Noe should probably stick to questioning his own existence.

It's objectively better in all metrics except cost.

Here's it's shown to be better than consoles visually. And the modders haven't even touched it yet.

Yeah it's a cash grab.

He's basically pushing to get companies more business paid for by taxpayers.

I've been learning to code on my own for more than the past 19 weeks pretty heavily.

I could not tell you anything about hashmaps. I can in fact avoid off-by-one errors :p

I still do the best I can but I feel like I have so much to learn I'll never get there.

So your argument is that the IDE is... Too good?

Because marketing.