This is far from the first electric bus setup.
Around 100 years ago something similar was tried in London. The service collapsed in 1909.
With a bus fleet BTW you can do as they did 100 years ago and just swap out battery packs alleviating the need for long recharging times.
Here is what climate scientist Edward Cook wrote regarding the accuracy of dendroclimatology:
Without trying to prejudice this work, but also because of what I
almost think I know to be the case, the results of this study will
show that we can probably say a fair bit about 100 year variability was like with any certainty (i.e. we know
with certainty that we know fuck-all).
From the climategate emails
Here is what Phil Jones said in his BBC interview regarding the Medieval Warm Period:
There is a debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was global or not. If it were to be conclusively shown that it was a global phenomenon, would you accept that this would undermine the premise that mean surface atmospheric temperatures during the latter part of the 20th Century were unprecedented?
There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia. For it to be global in extent the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern Hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.
Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today (based on an equivalent coverage over the NH and SH) then obviously the late-20th century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm that today, then current warmth would be unprecedented.
We know from the instrumental temperature record that the two hemispheres do not always follow one another. We cannot, therefore, make the assumption that temperatures in the global average will be similar to those in the northern hemisphere.
So Phil Jones is unsure if the MWP was global in extent and Edward Cook thinks we have very little idea at all. Perhaps the certainty in wikipedia is overstated.
The US cap and trade on sulphur dioxide emissions was passed in 1990.
Overall, the Program's cap and trade program has been successful in achieving its goals. Since the 1990s, SO2 emissions have dropped 40%, and according to the Pacific Research Institute, acid rain levels have dropped 65% since 1976.[15][16] However, this was significantly less successful than conventional regulation in the European Union, which saw a decrease of over 70% in SO2 emissions during the same time period.[17]
S02 emissions were also falling from a peak in the late 1970s toward the 1990s, in other words the US S02 trading scheme was on an already declining path and was less successful than more direct European approaches.
S02 emissions trading was also local and not between countries which is another area where the proposed Green House Gas emissions trading schemes fall down. A corrupt county can just 'create' permits and then sell them. This has already happened with European and other schemes.
A tax would be a much more honest, much more transparent scheme than an Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). ETS type solutions are attractive largely because politicians don't have to say they are a new tax, they can be easily gamed by giving out free permits and Enron style firms (including Enron itself before it went bankrupt) see a potential bonanza.
You're right about controls. The current smart phones have poor controls. Buttons are heaps better. The on screen joysticks for smartphones don't cut it.
With blue tooth you can have dedicated controls as an add on. The n900 can use the wiimote.
The iphone is a fine device. But your statement wildly overstates impact and improvements of the iphone over other phones.
In 1997 a reasonable phone looked like the 1997 Nokia 3110. By 2007 Nokia had the N95
In the 10 years till 2007 mobile phones, before the iphone had the following improvements:
But yeah, other than that, there hadn't been that much improvement....
Kilimanjaro has been retreating since the 1800s.
C02 in the atmosphere has only been shooting up since the 1950s. Pre-industrial C02 levels were about 2.8 parts per 10 000. As opposed to 4 or so now.
If these things pre-date C02's big increase this indicates a large role for natural climate variations.
This is what many skeptic say.
Below is an exact answer to part of the question of 3 reputable climate scientists who disagree with the consensus. The original was moderated to -1. If you are moderating and moderate views that you disagree with down even when they explicitly answer the question posed you are a lousy moderator.
So here again. 4 reputable climate scientists who disagree with what is above:
Richard Lindzen
Pat Michaels
Roy Spencer
Roger Pielke Snr
Look at the list of those who disagree on wikipedia and check the Senate Minority list for hundreds more.
here are 4 reputable scientists who disagree with the consensus:
Richard Lindzen
Pat Michaels
Roy Spencer
Roger Pielke Snr
There is a whole page of them on that most hidden of sites, wikipedia. The page of scientists who oppose the consensus is worth looking at for getting some names. Then go and see what they say, wikipedia falls over on this because there is an edit war that is dominated by alarmists, so it can be difficult to see what they actually say themselves.
There is also a list of 650 or so scientists who disagree with global warming alarmism, the Senate Minority list has them.
They may be wrong, but there are way more than 3 scientists who are prepared to go on the record and speak out against global warming alarmism.
True, part of it probably is the way I read. However it seems to be the way quite a few people are.
That's true about some jokes working better in print. Douglas Adam's books have great jokes about ideas and words that work better in print than in other media.
But, in general, the devices available live appeal more. The big point is that the parent post was unfairly marked as a troll when the guy was probably was expressing his point of view and a point of view that is probably held by quite a few people here.
Yeah, thanks, I have tried Pratchett and didn't like it. I keep meaning to read some more again and give it another chance.
Spaced is great. As are Black Books, The IT Crowd and The Inbetweeners.
"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight
