dude. you have an active imagination.. that's good. you allow it to warp your perception of reality in the here and now.. that's not so good.

if by one of those you mean person with working brain, then yes i am. if by 'conversation' you mean people using half their time ranting and raving about what is told to them by governments (who spend the other half of their time talking about how those same govenments lie all the time), then i will gladly refrain.

the level of denial and cognitive dissonance is deafening. if you really want proof, it's staring at you in the face. if you really want to know, read on. i refer to 9/11, ONLY because inherent in that is the 1 unmistakable fuckup which exposes the farce. they allowed 7 wtc to be filmed as it came down - in real time.. never mind ANYTHING else about that day. if you believe in the laws of physics , then you will know that only a controlled demolition could have caused it to come down AT free-fall speed. simple. done. all the 'rebuttals' dodge that issue, and talk about how it took damage blah blah blah. simple as that. free-fall of the building is not physically possible outside controlled demolition. once you realize that, and that the official narrative is not true, you begin to question a lot of things, but i'll leave all that alone. i doubt you will have gotten past your deeply ingrained fear of the realizing you don't live in the world you were raised to believe you were. thats ok. if this blows your mind, then good. you asked me for it. if it doesn't, then there is no reaching you at this stage. might as well keep believing jesus rode dinosaurs.

aaah - that makes heaps of sense. thanks for pointing that out.

you mean in terms of things that will likely allow for increased popular support to allow our government to further take away our freedom of speech (by the screaming ninny emotional responses by so many here?) yes. i suppose i stand corrected.

i steal this quote from another blogger, who i think put it well:
"Whenever emotional events like this happen many will jump to conclusions as to who, what, when, where and how. Our governments however have shown that they are completely untrustworthy. I will wait until we get more facts and not just the official sources before deciding what happened here. "

i guess im still relatively new enough to not realize that this comment was cliche, so apologies for that (i guess) but i still fail to see why this is 'stuff that matters'. if you mean 'stuff that matters' in terms of making people 'afraid' of a ghost threat which will be used to further give control to lying government/deep state entities, then i guess you're right. unfortunately, i suspect you believe it 'matters' because you are naive enough to believe what the pretty lady reading off the teleprompter tells you.

never mind the fact that this has been posted here well after it's already been on every other media outlet.. but why is this on /.?

you're forgetting providing 'jobs' for those who would be otherwise disenfranchised, and liable to cause problems.

agreed. but at least we can look back upon the good old days, where they actually made at least a half-assed effort to pretend it wasn't so

it also depends on what your definition of 'is' is.

i absolutely disagree. america is also a kleptocracy.

reminds me of that south park episode.. "Thank you ladies and gentlemen. If there are any questions, you may direct them to that brick wall over there."

don't like something on tv? now there's an app for that... initiate 4 billion complaints in under 10 seconds! just what the government 'surveys' of what the 'people want' ordered

rule 34 of the ancient world.. if you can think it.. there's a hieroglyph of it

representations of deities as men with animal parts are deliberate attempts to communicate messages in a language/medium which a normal person can receive - albeit perhaps at a level initially somewhat unconscious. a modest exploration of of myth and symbology should make this clear.

unless someone on the case is a cop.. in which case the DA won't give you enough evidence to indict.