By doing science perhaps. Now, wheres my cookie

its a reference. If you commit a crime and did nothing your guilty. I'm not an expert at this but by the law at least where I am, (Canada...perhaps USA as well) if someone commits a crime and do nothing, you are obligated to act...not do nothing and ignore. Thats what I meant. To me being aware of bugs and ignoring those bugs and forcing others to to do so is simply wrong.

You know, when you commit a crime and another person is aware of that crime and does nothing, that same person is guilty as well. If theres any legal repercusion to this...shouldn't they be involved...just say'n

Viacom bitches at Youtube for copyright uploads but when you look at Viacom like most websites, they don't do enough to stop this compared to Youtube. It does take some knowledge to "download" a video of anyone on Youtube and not everyone or THAT little kid or grandma can do it. Youtube also have some tools available to prevent this like the content ID system and some report tools to help this. To me, this sounds like a big loss to Youtube and the copyright issues against people as well. This only means that companies could use this copyright lawsuit as a support document if someone wants to go against Youtube for copyright cases.

I don't think the prison itself is the problem but whats in it is. I mean, put 1 man in a prison to think about what he done wrong and over time I'm sure he'll have no choice to think about it. But today... you got gangs, violence, murder, rape, drugs. On top of that you gotta think about your own survival. You got no time to think about what you've done wrong. Theres no real therapy to "fix" what you've done as well. WTF is this technology will do that will improve our current prison system ?

Its incredible how a mac user (I presume you are but I could be wrong with your antivirus answer) but to think that mac don't need an anti-virus is simple stupid and arrogant at the same time. It's not because you got a mac that your invulnurable on viruses. Phishing works with a browser and every OS as one. my recent link in my post was about the flashback bot which works in browsers. Guess what ? Mac has browsers too and since people know mac don't have an anti-virus guess what will hackers or people with bad intention do ? They' ll probably attack mac users especially since Apple got more popularity in recent years. So mac users should get out of their tower of illusion and embrace reality before its too late. Cause right now WIndows users or most of them made their research, work and studies on viruses and antiviruses and most are ready. How much mac users are ready against the upcoming threats ?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-2707...

it has viruses in flash too. be warned apple users, your not invulnurable as you think. You'll need an anti-virus, anti-malware and anti everything to protect your so called inpenetrable OS. "Resistance is futile" lol

and don't even tell me the use for it since I have none because I use other services like twitter and reddit for my "other" needs that I can use.

When google plus inevitably fails(and it will)

he didnt say its failing. it will fail. review in verbs please

it is when the gov request censoring or you cant publish your game in that specific country... Ubisoft didn't want trouble so they decided to go pre-emptive on the sensorship business before the gov or organisation goes apeshit on it like it happened in Australia multiple times.

Ubisoft as nothing to do with this censorship btw. Ubisoft and other publishers do the games. It's the countries that makes the censorship so the main problem comes from those places...not the company. Look at Saint Row 4 problems in Australia. They dare censor and block the game but gave multiple different version of their blocking reasons...which changed from a day to day basis which made no sense. Censorship usually happens because of a lack of knowledge over computers, the game itself and the main reason of the censorship too oddly enough.

Since Netflix bented and gave vasoline to Comcast, i wish Google an Facebook would do it JUST CAUSE THEY CAN. It would show that you need 2 player to play this game. That way, when its going to be ridiculous, maybe an organisation or the gov could step in and create laws about this.

Saying a one thing but doing it is another thing. All I know is that lobbyist are very strong here since netflix and comcast generates huge loads of money. I don't think Comcast is ready to give up the attacks but this is a good day for net neutrality.

It's a scam EA uses on their game to force people to leave a 5 star rating. The amount of taps or effort to use a lower score is enormous compared to the usualy non-scam way to do it. EA's method is perfect to leave a 5 star or email the company. It's legal but its morally FUCKING WRONG