Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Venezuelan Regime Censoring Twitter

Saúl González D. writes: After two days of massive protests, the Venezuelan government has finally taken to censoring Twitter. Users of Venezuela's largest ISP CANTV, which is owned by the government, are reporting that either Twitter-embedded images will not load or that Twitter will fail to load at all. I am an user myself and can confirm that only Twitter is affected and that switching to the Tor browser solves the issue.
As news of the protests are not televised, for most Venezuelans Twitter and Facebook are their only means of obtaining real-time information.
Despite a progressive worsening of civil and human rights, governments of the world have shied away from directly labeling Maduro a dictator or demanding the OAS' Democratic Charter be activated. Will open censorship be the tipping point?

Comment Hardware/OS level indicator (Score 1) 109

The built-in camera on my Macbook turns on a hardware light whenever it's being used. Makes it pretty hard to not realize you are potentially being seen. All OSs should display an indicator on the top layer of the display, and enlarge/flash it in a pretty unmissable way every 5 minutes, whenever your camera OR microphone is active. Failure of an OS to do so should be labeled as what it is, a security hazard.

Comment Re:And people called Atlas Shrugged Fiction.... (Score 1) 702

The objection was because state run shops were selling the same models for 1/5th the price or less.

Not even that part is true. Many state-run shops are (even now) selling at similar or even higher prices than Daka did. I've seen the pictures, they've spread like wildfire in social networks.

Comment Re:Next comes the blood. (Score 1) 702

You are being disingenuous, or are merely ignorant of the wider context (IMHO). You can't debate this subject honestly without seriously discussing the CIA and USA's role in attempting a violent overthrow of Chavez, early in his widely accepted as legitimate democratic leadership.

Actually, this comment makes you look like the disingenuous or uniformed one.

- No evidence or even convincing theories of USA involvement in the attempted overthrow of 2002 have ever been produced.

- While Chavez had been legitimately elected in 1999, by 2002 he had managed to piss off a large fraction of the population by constantly overreaching and refusing to discuss or negotiate anything at all. The attempted overthrow came when this fraction of people thought that the radical measures that Chavez was taking (unprecedented concentration of power on his person) were a huge threat to the stability and well-being of the country. Seeing how Venezuela has gone to shit 10 years later, it would seem they were right. TL,DR: there was legitimate internal discontent. (No need to sow discord from the outside.)

- The events of 2002 could be hardly described as violent. There were far more dead and wounded in the Chavez-led 1992 failed coup.

- As for the 2002 dead, the government accused some cops of their murder but never even bothered to provide any evidence at all. Years later, the judge in charge of the trial fled the country and publicly admitted that it had been a sham trial. Even as one such cop, Ivan Simonovis, is dying in prison from multiple diseases (he has gone whole months without daylight, which is considered torture in civilized countries) the government refuses to grant him even an humanitarian measure.

Comment Re:Get some facts first, or wait til dust settles (Score 5, Interesting) 702

And did Venezuela stop being able to import groceries after they seized El Exito? Was the country ruined?

Actually a lot of Venezuelans would answer "pretty much" to both questions. Major shortages of basic goods, like flour, sugar, cooking oil and toilet paper started around the time and continue to this day. The collapse of the economy and the skyrocketing crime make living in Venezuela very harsh now.

Hunger and poverty have gone down significantly since 1999. Even the anti-Chavez people accept this.

Chavez's only merit was to be lucky enough to rise to power just in time for the biggest boom in oil prices in the History of Venezuela. The governments of the 80s and 90s never had nearly as many resources as Chavez had. The governments of the 70s were close, and they were MUCH better at reducing poverty (without the violence and hate Chavez brought).

Chavez also seized the oil companies, and stopped Venezuela's biggest resource being a cash cow for foreign companies.

Plain false. Oil industry was nationalized in 1976, over 30 years before Chavez. If anything Chavez has led to Venezuela's biggest resource to be a huge cash cow for Cuba and China.

I've never been there. It's probably the country I most want to visit, and one of the main reasons is because it's so hard for a foreigner to know what the country is really like. I just read the Venezuelan newspapers and talk to Venezuelans sometimes here in Europe (mostly rich Venezuelans who don't like Chavez).

Please do. Venezuelan malandros eat naive, easily-deceived first-worldies like you for lunch.

Comment Re:Next comes the blood. (Score 5, Informative) 702

But that should not be happening in a country with a highly marketable commodity (oil). The nationalization of the oil industry has not been able to maintain previous levels after US and Dutch oil techs were driven out of the country, and production has fallen off by a quarter, and exports fallen off by half since Chavez came to power.

Nationalization has been a major fiasco.

And those (nationalized) refineries aren't going to be fixed by Big Oil. Fool them once. They have a long memory.

Off by over 30 years, pal. The Venezuelan oil industry was nationalized in 1976, and it ran pretty well long after "US and Dutch oil techs were driven out of the country". The decline started in 2003, after Chavez fired en-masse those not loyal to his party. Chavez, not nationalization, ruined the oil industry.

Comment Dictatorship, plain and simple. (Score 5, Insightful) 702

In 30 years, current Venezuela will be held as the prime example of how they ran a thinly-veiled dictatorship while the rest of the world looked the other side and refused to call a spade a spade. It takes lots of guts to call "democracy" a country where critics of the government never appear on live, unedited TV. It takes lots of guts to call "democracy" a country where the president forcefully takes control of the media airwaves every day. It takes lots of guts to call "democracy" a country where the government openly threatens its workers with dismissal if they're found to be voting "for the counter-revolution". It takes lots of guts to call "democracy" a country where the next election day (Dec.8) has been officially declared "Day of Fealty to Chavez".

Comment Re:No, the plasma TVs aren't ten a penny (Score 5, Informative) 702

I live in Caracas. Parent is utter and complete bullshit. NO media in Venezuela is owned by foreign companies, and certainly not by US ones. Actually, the government owns more than half of all media companies, and constantly threatens privately-owned media with closure if they don't toe the official line. That is a threat that they've actually followed thru with more than once. Look it up yourself if you don't believe me. Parent is a Maduro shill or worse.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember, UNIX spelled backwards is XINU. -- Mt.

Working...