Comment Re:try SLASH (Score 1) 57
Wasn't it a 24 bit field, not a 32 bit field?
I remember thinking "24 bits? Really? What were they saving those last 8 bits for - the alpha value?"
Wasn't it a 24 bit field, not a 32 bit field?
I remember thinking "24 bits? Really? What were they saving those last 8 bits for - the alpha value?"
Still waiting for examples of how to exploit this (remotely or otherwise), without using an existing hole to do so.
Plesk has a test.cgi file enabled by default. Here, go exploit all these hosts:
https://www.google.com/search?...
Thanks. I did untrust the obvious ones, such as the Turkish and Chinese certs, however the list is long and I'd like to tighten the security a bit. Is there any way to see which certs I've actually _used_ so that I could start making informed decisions? Take for example "Trustis Limited". On what basis would I decide to keep or leave it.
I don't mean to be a pain, but you seem to be the only person who understands this subject. Even googling the subject does not return many useful links. Thanks.
Which CAs do you leave in place? Can you mention for each of those why you leave it? I ask as a user who intends to start doing the same, and I would like to know _why_ to trust or leave in place the CAs that are left.
Thanks.
It's always refreshing to see stuff like this waft across the front page of
(Pro-Tip: Please mod this "+1 Nostalgic"
Mod points. Please, mod points for this.
In comparison, shortscreen monitors (often mislabeled as widescreen) are a trend which has no logical or technical underpinning.
You are holding it wrong. No, really.
I've got a longscreen monitor (widescreen turned 90 degrees). It fits 120+ characters on a line and shows 122 lines of code plus two additional lines for the VIM status line. The other widescreen monitor is running Firefox with the tabs on the side (Tree Style Tabs) and the KDE panel on the left side of the screen, not the bottom. This is the absolute best setup that I could imagine.
Just stop wasting the vertical space and make better use of the horizontal space. I was a 4:3 holdout for the longest time, now I love the widescreens.
Sending IS back to hell with airpower is easy when they are out in the open. But once Islamic State fighters retreat to towns like Fallujah it will be very difficult to twist them out of their holes. It will require house to house fighting and the towns will be more or less destroyed in the process with great cost to any civilians in the area. If the Shiite dominated Iraq Army does it there will be all kinds of payback. But I doubt they will step up. It will be up to mostly the US with help from the UK and some token help from a few other countries.
Colin Powell was right. We broke it, we bought it.
This is exactly what happened in Gaza the past few weeks, to weed out Hamas.
Where are the mod points when I need them. Sad day when nobody even at
Maintaining the code of others? Heck, I have found in perl, that it was easier to rewrite a program than try to debug it even if I wrote the original program.
I've often heard of Perl being referred to as a write-only language.
That list comprehension is actually very much the reason why Python is terrific. C# programmers will be familiar with the idea from Linq.
for: This is a for loop
a,b,c,d: Each value of the iterator is itself composed of 4 values. In Python this is called a tuple, but you can think of it as an array if it helps. The first value is bound to a, the second to b, etc. Thus, the variables a,b,c, and d are defined in the loop body.
in: The next thing mentioned is the iterator
[x.q for x in y if x.z]+[x.r for x in y if x.z]: This iterator is a mess, let's look at it's parts, which are:
[x.q for x in y if x.z]
+
[x.r for x in y if x.z]:
[x.q for x in y if x.z]: y is an iterator. Return only the q property of each item in y, only if the z property is defined. This results in a list (another Python datatype which you can think of as an array) being return, of q properties.
[x.r for x in y if x.z]: y is an iterator. Return only the r property of each item in y, only if the z property is defined. This results in a list being return, of r properties.
+: Combine the list of q properties with the list of r properties.
Like learning another (human) language, it it incomprehensible at first. However, I'm no Pythonista and even for me it was very simple to figure out what this does.
Cyborgs are just kinds of humans, so yes.
The situation is really not that simple, even if you consider non-cyborg humans. See this Stack Exchange thread on the topic:
http://philosophy.stackexchang...
HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!