When folks start hearing stories of houses being accessed via these means, they will raise their bars.
Waiting to hear "stories" would be of no use if, for example, attackers choose to wait until a nationwide cold-snap and then simultaneously brick one million thermostats.
If there's a public safety concern about people hacking code in cars, then copyright is not the way to address it. The purpose of copyrights is purportedly to encourage the production of more works. It is certainly not intended to be a tool for ensuring public safety.
Ideally, hacking safety-related code (and then driving it on a public highway) should be legal only if the hacker got the appropriate certifications to work on that area, along with insurance riders to go with it. This would be completely unrelated to the copyright status of the original code.
If it's acceptable for machines to be playground equailizers than all schoolchildren should be issued sidearms and be given training on how to employ deadly force to stop bullying.
Projectiles from your puny weapons will simply bounce off my armored playground robot.
Now, hand over your weapon and your lunch box to the machine.
A compromise could be the use of still photographs..
Why compromise?
All the city bus drivers in my area are on video surveillance. We routinely get to see footage of accidents and altercations with crazed passengers on the local news.
If it's good enough for a bus, it should be good enough for someone responsible for the safety of a 500mph $200M machine.
What if we reverse the polarity of the graphene coating?
It reverts to an incandescent bulb with an average lifetime of about 500ms.
Umm, that's why I originally said that languages should explicitly support both trapping and non-trapping versions.
Can anyone identify a product or service that Amazon doesn't sell or provide?
Job prospects are going to be few and far between if you leave Amazon.
If his garbage causes you take take a different flow of execution, however, that provides him a way to reach bugs in the little-used parts of your code.
The different flow of execution triggered by an overflow trap should almost always be a simple call to "abort()". At this point, your program has already failed and should be stopped.
I disagree with your premise. Garbage input values should be checked and rejected in software before the overflow ever occurs. The hardware overflow check should be a last resort to enforce this at every instruction step, and in the worst case it converts privilege exploits into less serious DOS attacks.
Allowing "garbage output" as you propose just creates more opportunities for attacks when that output gets consumed somewhere.
What flag is that then?
On an X86, "V".
Not that checking it after every add instruction is really that practical. It would be better to have trapping and non-trapping versions of integer arithmetic, and to have languages with semantics which expose that choice to the programmer.
I'd like to invest in your fascinating scheme to sink $Trillions into needlessly duplicating infrastructure. Your concept of buying new 5X cost buried cables to compete with existing overhead wires just brilliant as well. Are you offering stock yet?
I think this is mainly going to be an excuse for hotels to add a daily $7.99 (+ $1.39 tax) "Robot Fee" to your bill.
So the containment structures were not in fact designed to contain the melted core?
Sure... Just like the way the nuclear reactors were designed to not melt down in the first place.
DST is not a bad idea. Who the hell is going to wake up at 4:00 a.m. in June? Who is going to do anything enjoyable or productive in the wee hours of the morning when they've still got a looming commute to work?
Stop all the damned whining and enjoy the sunlight while you're actually awake.
You've found me out! I admit it, I'm a member of a vast conspiracy that's foisting "static observation" on an unsuspecting public.
You didn't even read the article summary at the top of the page, did you?
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
