If you reduce the chance, you do prevent it in at least some cases. So, your statement is in fact not accurate, as there is HOPE. I will repeat it, EATING well does prevent cancer in at least some people.
I suppose its just semantics, but if it is really eating poorly that causes risk to increase, then not eating poorly is not really preventing cancer, just not causing it. So, its really not eating bad food that lowers cancer risk.... and of course that implies eating well. Kind of like saying not riding in a car prevents you from getting a serious injury from an accident...technically true but kind of useless when looking for prevention techniques.
Not eating anything will prevent cancer.
Eliminate any exceptions to the CAFE standard for SUVs.
And while they are at it, find a way to get EV owners to pay their share of taxes for road maintenance, now covered largely by the gas tax.
My Camry Hybrid is quieter, smoother, and has over 30 extra HP compared to the 4 cyl Camry.
What HP does it get compared to the 6 cylinder?
It's not people switching back, it's people buying a second car for their household.
The numbers reported are based on trading in their EV for and SUV, a switch, not those that keep one and buy a second vehicle. You could be right, but you have no data to show that they own a second EV at the time of trade in.
But I very much doubt that there's a line of Leaf or Tesla owners trading their EVs for SUVs.
Probably not Tesla, but Leaf owners tend to be younger, and many single. Many get married, have kids, and decide to move to an SUV. Sounds very plausible. I doubt it is fuel cost alone, but rather functionality and changing needs or desires as well.
I think we can conclude that any politicians singing on to retroactively extend copyright terms are clearly corrupt.
Its to protect a secret cache of Gordon Lightfoot recordings. Worth untold sums of money.
So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand