Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Get a VPS, host yourself (Score 1) 456

The other great thing is that you make a disk image of your VPS and store it remotely as a backup. Then if you decide to move, you just find another company running the same VM software and restore the entire image. BAM! It doesn't get any easier.

I've been doing this for years and it works great. Plus you can always start up the VM software at home (since most places use free software anyway) and do remote development with your *compete* live environment. It's great.

Almost 60 VPSes currently running under my name and wouldn't recommend anything less to anyone as tech savvy as the Slashdot crowd!

Comment Re:No more support (Score 3, Insightful) 512

I should have clarified. My sites are all now built for HTML5 and every attempt is made to stay standards-compliant.

While users with older browsers are redirected, the entire site (short of the few pages with directions) use those standards and are still visible selects the ``I know my browser was made in the 1800s but I still want to see your site'' link.

It's code and pages that I wrote one and just copy into new sites. *That's* what I wish more people would do. We could all gently urge those who either don't know or don't care and perhaps make the web a better place, one user at a time.

Comment Re:Does anyone really believe the scores ? (Score 1) 169

Not everyone. Tons of sites list both critic and player reviews and there's often a fairly large difference between both which tells a rather fascinating story. At the same time, those can't be trusted 100% of the time as a lot of people will get together and review bomb (look at Modern Warfare 2 on the PC for a good example, review bombed with 0s and 1s on a few sites due to its lack of PC LAN server support).

That being said, I don't know how the folks from the quoted article missed myself and my friends. I believe all of us look at scores, especially on new, non-franchise titles and sometimes even those too.

But in the end, it's price that always ends up being my final deciding factor. $60 per game is a tough pill to swallow for a new title. Long live Game Stop and Walmart with their used sales!

Comment Re:Dog bites man (Score 1) 532

And yet IE8 is beta, and that is what the original reply was in regards to.

The point is that this ``speed comparison'' is complete bunk designed to pump FUD and get the product out there.

This is basically Microsoft's version of timing a top fuel dragster on a 4.4 second run with an analog watch by counting every time the hand moves, and it's a brand new 8,500 HP machine in one lane and a 6,500 HP rig from a few years ago in the other.

Intel

Submission + - Intel Purchases Havok

Dr. Eggman writes: Gamasutra has the recent announcement; Intel has bought Havok. Havok, a renouned game tools company whose efforts have been featured in the likes of Half-Life 2 and Bioshock, will remain in operation with buisness as usual. As a wholly owned Intel subsidiary, Havok will continue to produce products such as its recently announced Havok 5 toolset.
PC Games (Games)

Submission + - An In Depth Look Into Chinese "Gold Farming

Henry V .009 writes: The The New York Times describes the life of a Chinese World of Warcraft "Gold Farmer": At the end of each shift, Li reports the night's haul to his supervisor, and at the end of the week, he, like his nine co-workers, will be paid in full. For every 100 gold coins he gathers, Li makes 10 yuan, or about $1.25, earning an effective wage of 30 cents an hour, more or less. The boss, in turn, receives $3 or more when he sells those same coins to an online retailer, who will sell them to the final customer (an American or European player) for as much as $20.
Software

Submission + - Apple picks a fight it can't win with Safari (computerworld.com)

Ian Lamont writes: "Mike Elgan has an analysis of Apple's successes and concludes that the release of the Safari browser for Windows not only goes against the Apple success formula, but is doomed to a vicious failure:

The insular Apple universe is a relatively gentle place, an Athenian utopia where Apple's occasional missteps are forgiven, all partake of the many blessings of citizenship, and everyone feels like they're part of an Apple-created golden age of lofty ideas and superior design. But the Windows world isn't like that. It's a cold, unforgiving place where nothing is sacred, users turn like rabid wolves on any company that makes even the smallest error, and no prisoners are taken. Especially the Windows browser market. ... While security nerds were ripping Apple for a buggy beta, the UI enthusiasts started going after Apple for the look and feel. Here's a small sample. Apple can expect much more of this in the future. The problem? Safari for Windows just isn't Windows enough.
Elgan also expects that the Firefox faithful will fight the Safari infux — a theory that has been supported by comments from Mozilla executive John Lilly, who criticized Steve Jobs' 'blurry view of real world' just after Jobs announced Safari for Windows."

Linux Business

Submission + - GPLv2 or GPLv3?: Inside the Debate (earthweb.com)

jammag writes: "This article, GPLv2 or GPLv3?: Inside the Debate details the various disputes without blowing hot air. Amid all the wrangling by the various parties, the article makes an interesting point: that large companies may see benefit in GPLv3 on a bottom-line basis. Forget philosophy or legalese — it's cold cash that will carry the day for GPLv3."

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...