51% agree with the statement: "Computers will be able to create art as well as humans."
I wonder if people realize that this requires an AI so advanced that it's indistinguishable from the human brain, with fine motor skills to match. I see this as highly unlikely.
At least, it's far less likely than controlling the weather, which is something we can do already: http://www.geoengineeringwatch...
Internet. Interconnected networks. No where does that mean unlimited bandwidth or even guaranteed connectivity from network to network. It is not Comcast's responsibility to provide enough bandwidth for you to stream a 3rd party software at maximum bandwidth, just like it's not their responsibility that you have 10 ping to a Counterstrike server in South Korea. Cogent is just as much responsible for this as Comcast. Cogent is serving as Netflix's ISP and they are not providing enough bandwidth to Comcast end users.
And if they're the only option?
National Insecurity Agency
Lol...that reminds me of this: http://cdn.slowrobot.com/72420...
If a philosophical joke whooshed clean over everyone's head, is it still a joke?
If a Tesla hits a mime in a carpool lane, does anyone care?
They're the foot in the door for Big Pharma, in which both the foundation and Gates are heavily invested.
Actually, he sold his big pharma investments in 2009: http://online.wsj.com/news/art...
Maybe you should try reading the ingredients on the Kool-Aid before you drink it. >.>
I wouldn't say it will do 'almost nothing', since the stats clearly show otherwise.
Still, if police were *required* to submit video evidence for any trial that involves an officer or have the case dismissed, it would certainly cut down on police corruption. Police wouldn't be able to use the 'oh, my camera was broken' or 'I forgot to turn it on' as an excuse.
'I hear from developers all the time about this,' says Ed McMahon.
I thought he died...
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato