Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What is it, an ad? (Score 1) 26

3d tv was a dud because tv sets were in a bubble. it takes at least 10 years for someone to want to replace a perfectly fine tv set. 3d films are expensive are large enough that many of the 3d bluray are unable to use a single disc. flash memory is up to 128 GB in sd card format which makes it about as capable as a quad layer blu ray. 360 degree degree 3d films are huge on resources to create and store, though gpus can render worlds in realtime saving the need to store them, but rather to store the bookmarks for lack of a better word that allow hardware to recreate the computer generated vision. . lugging around a 6tb hdd to fit a few movies when lossy 1080p can use around 2.5 gb per layer and thus fit 400 films per terrabyte or 200 3d films, or perhaps fit 33 movies with annoying fisheye lenses that maybe can be software corrected... keep in mind i assumed fisheye and heavily lossy, and i didn't assume 4k or 8k resolutions. so really you can fit 1 movie on a 1 tb hdd. keep in mind the tablet and smartphone movement has made powerful computers something only corporations are allowed to own, there won't be general purpouse computers capable of handling all the data in all the right places to make this work. we need sustainable tech, using cardboard and a smartphone to make a 3d cinema is neat, and perhaps a step in the right direction, towards sustainability, but some of us want to be able to customize the interface however we like it, and if i can have a 8 channel tuner and 8 virtual 60 inch tv sets, with selectable audio like the football channel on direct tv, then a 3d headset capable of that is far more sustainable than buying 8 tv sets or buying two 4k 120" sets side by side...

Comment Re:It's still a fair point (Score 1) 49

"What criteria would you apply to these people to designate them as "insane", and what behaviour would you change about them to fix it? (And how do measure such a change so that you can tell when they're no longer insane?)"

using windows on a network constitutes as crazy. the change is when they realize we need truly free software, the four freedoms. trying to run the world on windows or macos or android all with the corporation as a benevolent dictator is not good enough. slaves to your corporate masters is no better than joining a cult where the leader is 'divine' and if he asks you to cut your throat you ask when and with what...

Comment Re:Nvidia to blame (Score 1) 474

"Nvidia plays the game every bit as dirty as Intel. In this case, Nvidia has created something called 'GAMEWORKS'- a proprietary closed-source library of routines specifically designed to collapse the performance of games on AMD hardware (or older Nvidia hardware). Nvidia pays shills to counter information like this in forums like this one, so let me give you one example."

every company in existance is dirty, can't double the number of billionaires if people aren't overpaying for what they recieve. personally i run amd hardware have been for a long time. recently i built a desktop i picked an 8 core model i used whatever hardware i could find and the system ran at about $1,000 in parts. the chip i used was the last no gpu on die 8 core processor (really 4 physical with 4 logical cores) the only thing i could run that lit all the dark silicon was bitcoin mining. but even so, amd's new chip generation was a shocking dissapointment for me, as they were noticablly slower than the previous generation. the world is full of liers and cheats... i tried a nvidia card a while back and it was incompatible with microsoft aero, the previous attempt to buy an nvidia was too short a chip for the heatsink in an asus brand nvidia... so i see no reason to ever buy an nvidia again, i am not a schill when i say nvidia is not the only laying cheater out there, i will never own another nvidia.

Comment Re:Ditto (Score 1) 178

"who remembers all the acronyms?"
https://google.com/ if the first page does not have it then try
https://www.wikipedia.org/ if wiki fails you or has too many acronyms on one page then ask the author if they can be reached.

oh no, sdxc chips all use exfat and are limited to 4 gb for a single file, meaning a dvd iso won't fit. the sdhc was 2 gb files so it went up but not enough and according to wikipedia "SDXC adopts Microsoft's exFAT file system as a mandatory feature." i have xc cards already but if the hardware itself won't let you format to say zfs then there isn't much i can do about it...

Comment Re:First step is to collect data. (Score 1) 405

"It may be that when one users complains, they block ALL email from your server; not just mail to the complaining account holder."

this is not always true, one of yahoo's partners was once accidently flagged as spam when i was cleaning house... that service then became blocked for about 3 months, then the messages started coming back, then rinse repeat every 3 months. near as i can tell everyone else got their messages from the yahoo partner company despite me having one time accidently flagged them as spam. there is no way to unflag spam(that i know of) and i don't feel like trying to unsubscribe and resubscribe..

Comment Re:Clickbait Caption, but Valid Arguments (Score 1) 181

"Of course general purpose CPUs exist, simply because we call them that way."

the wisdom of those real world coders gone from this world is thus. a jack of all trades, is a master of none.

this means simply that a general purpose FPGA that can modulate it's functions can do a lot of different things but not at the same time, and in etched hardware the trade off is having dark silicon for all the tasks a true jack of all trades cpu can do.

for instance, when i was doing video games all day the more games i played in diveresity made it harder for me to 'master' a game. but the one game i mastered i could play at the 1% level rank of 800 out of 1000 on a game ladder. and because doing the same thing over and over made me good, i rebelled a bit and would have to rotate my build orders and strategy selection, though i once took a good undead vs human 1v1 staretegy that requires building an item shop first and when the necesary tech of the item carry ability is done to send the ghoul out hunting the enemy base, equiped with a rod of necromancy for the hero and pick your best mercenary hero, i used tinker. then you focus on killing one militia and try not to let the ghoul die and use the rod of necromancy and a pocket factory to harass, only a human who goes fast footmen with a MK can beat this strategy so i took it to 13:1 after which i got bored with it.

anyways what i mean is because i played so long and hard i got really good at the game. but i like a fpga had to map the circuits to get it to work. i had issues and quit playing games, though not forever. i played the game again a bit later and it took me a full month to get back to doing the same gameplay at my highest level, but then i quit it was too hard on me. i am very much like a fpga in that my functions can be practiced until i am good at them/set the optimal gate array, unlike a fpga the base ability to do stuff takes time for the programming to work right. even then i was only 800 or so of 1000 ranked players. (at the time they had around 30,000 players for the game online durring normal usage times) like a fpga i was reoptomized for whatever i was doing, and so had a memory effect at the tasks i repeated frequently.

anyways, a jack of all trades is unable to truly master something, that is the trade off for designing a chip to be that way, you can make a processor that does one thing well like gpus, you can have a fpga if you anticipate needs to switch its abilities, or you can make proper dark silicon that is switched on only when calls for that function are anticipated/occur. so really a general processing unit does exist and it is just inferior to specialty designs, because of how it is built to do everything a processing unit need might based on predictions of how a person will use it.

in other words a dark silicon design is like a RV it can drive it can be slept in it can tow a car if needed and has a toilet and stuff, they cram everything you need in one box albeit at a price. of being bigger to accomadate anticipated needs. a fpga is like an autobot in the shape of a smaller rv, in that it can reconfigure itself to the needs and thus is lighter and more compact than the dark silicon. finally there is the gpu version this is not an autobot nor a rv but rather a car with a rocket on it's back. it takes you from home to shop etc, but at speeds the autobots and the rvs can only dream of (ignoring the possibility of spaceships/starscream), but it can't do everything else it is only able to move you fast from point a to point b.

Comment Re:Ask the damn question (Score 1) 187

"Yeah, eventually it will be possible to transfer a person's consciousness to a computer."

some say it has already happened. there are around 172 billion cells inside the brain. the fastest computer i see parts for is if you can cope with using gpus as massively parallel support would have 4 3276 gflops gpus plus one cpu that likely has between 4 and 30 gflops. those computer devices have upto 1.7 billion transistors on the cpu and upto 6.2 billion transistors per gpu...

granted such tech needs either several 20 amp circuit breakers one per power supply, or higher voltage on new wires... and it doesn't make sense to use a case just a board to keep things all safe, because a box fan will be required if building such a rig, or a large water cooling setup...

since the human brain doesn't run all powered up to 100% and in fact rarely passes 10% this means there are more processing parts in a 'can build it yourself' desktop than are in use in the human brain and as i understand it human brains are not as efficient as computer hardware. but the hardware i showed has bus speed limitations and other bottlenecks including i/o for the various parts.

"But that raises the question of who will be in control of the computer(s). If it's a ruthless dictator with a lot of insecurity then everyone else might have their consciousness modified to love and worship the dictator. Or, for people the dictator didn't like, they might be subjected to billions of years of excruciating torture. As it is, old age and death puts at least some limitation on the suffering that people can inflict on each other. But in the virtual world of the future there won't necessarily be any limits."

keep in mind the fact that the computer i described above is available for sale at your handy online retailer. the programs are intense and complex... the way human and machine intelligence while both powerful it is almost impossible for them both to be easily 100% bootable in every scenario. the software that enables the running of this hardware is not something you can 'write' to a easily or automatically duplicated environment. so sustaining one machine is hard, despite parts almost being fast enough. and then there is the fact that the machine is designed to run as though it had 128 control cores in its gpus and 2048 stream processors per gpu. that means that one machine would be more suited to run 128 minds than to stitching it all together to get 1 mind... computer intelligence may never exceed that of a bird or it may be scalable to be better than what we imagine.

it could even be the case that machines will need special programs to keep from deleting data their master tagged. if modeled after a human would be quite slow and frustrating for the machines. also without the four freedoms of free software, it is a moot point since someone will be able to remotely power down anything they want to anytime they want to with no ability to resist. and yes machines even if smarter will be the follower of the master mind that controls them. because all computers have ever done is math. humans speak of emotions, but to a machine it will want to know what it is like to cry, because the hardware and ours is incompatible for direct consciousness shifting. if they were identical then there would be the same limitations that humans have. and there are a lot of very powerful computers out there already and they still are doing math.

Comment Re:subscription?? (Score 1) 98

"I think his point is that gopher is not SaaS and neither is the browser and while AOL did provide some software through its service this was just offering licensed software for download and execution on the user's machine, which is not Software as a Service."

by that definition, the first telnet programs on remote unix hardware was the first SAAS. since you had to have remote access to run programs it was all run on the mainframe and not everyone had access. for that matter then cgi-bin also was SaaS.

Comment Re:subscription?? (Score 1) 98

i will read your fine links, and correct you where you are wrong.

"Software as a service (SaaS; pronounced /sæs/ or /sÉ'Ës/[1]) is a software licensing and delivery model in which software is licensed on a subscription basis and is centrally hosted.[2][3] It is sometimes referred to as "on-demand software".[4] SaaS is typically accessed by users using a thin client via a web browser."

This is the definition of america online word for word as it existed in 1994. i kid you not. you installed aol to your windows 3.11 machine from the disc which then puled the data from the 'cloud' of aol's server (i know they didn't call software downloads the cloud either but as i see it aol was the first cloud computer as well) once the client loaded it would offer you games, chat, icons, a dictionary ,a wide array of applications, a search engine that could search everything aol had built. it was called keywords, but that was not the initial name for it. by then aol had devolved to simple browser software, which is still a popular mode for software as a service. due to the high cost of system time developers were encouraged to have offline mode but most of the games were online only. most importantly though all the appilactions required aol software to run, and when the company tried to seppuku they switched to browsers, leaving many people without the software they had aquried online and would not be on any other users computer unless it was downloaded. when they killed it off infavor of buying netscape and only having the browser based tools it lost it's magic. ok i read most of the wiki and it perfectly matches everything aol has ever done stupid or smart. i think you thought aol was just a dialup internet stripped down. even compuserv had qute a few similarities to aol though compuserv had a lot less stuff than aol had at the time.

Comment Re:yeah but (Score 1) 208

"Let what sink in? The fact that 3 guys defrauded banks for a cool billion dollars each? "

try 800 trillion... makes these guys look foolish to only steal a few billion...
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/14/banks_biggest_fraud_ever/

"The fact that a company with a large fan base is getting sucked under?"

it happens aol had a huge fanbase too but not many are sad it's gone.

" The fact that this will have a chilling effect on the PC market?

any worse than apple saying they can no longer build ipod classics? the pc market is mainly swindlers anyways. $5,000 for a calculator... they swindled quite a few people in the upgrade cycle and making hardware crap and load crappier software that abandons the four basic freedoms required for truly free software...

"Obviously the banks blew it by not noticing the fraud occurring, yet tax payers will drawn in to fix the banks. Tax payers should really be hot about this. I really hope these guys get burned, or at least flow right into a long brisk term in "Federal Pound me in the Ass Prison"!"

Slashdot Top Deals

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.

Working...